The influence of anxiety and quality of interaction on collaborative test performance
Abstract
This research investigated the relationships among test performance, anxiety, and the quality of interaction during collaborative testing of college students. It also explored which students are most likely to benefit from collaborative testing. It was randomly determined whether a student would take each of six examinations alone or with a partner. Collaborative testing resulted in higher scores than individual testing for a significant number of students, conferring an advantage of 3.83%. Test performance was positively correlated with quality of interaction. Students with higher levels of test anxiety were most likely to benefit from collaborative testing and to experience the greatest test anxiety reduction.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 34 · Cited by 33
- Authors
- Pandey, C., & Kapitanoff, S.
- Affiliations
- Los Angeles Pierce College (US)
- American Jewish University (US)
- ORCID
- Kapitanoff, Susan
- Venue
- Active Learning in Higher Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-10-19
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 163-174
- ISSN
- 1469-7874 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2625
- OpenAlex
- W1977352453
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Active Learning in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Keywords
- collaborative testing, test anxiety, interaction quality, test performance, university students, peer interaction, anxiety reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review