Cited by 33Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsInnovative Teaching MethodsStudent Assessment and Feedback

The influence of anxiety and quality of interaction on collaborative test performance

Pandey, Carol, Kapitanoff, Susan·2011·Active Learning in Higher Education

Abstract

This research investigated the relationships among test performance, anxiety, and the quality of interaction during collaborative testing of college students. It also explored which students are most likely to benefit from collaborative testing. It was randomly determined whether a student would take each of six examinations alone or with a partner. Collaborative testing resulted in higher scores than individual testing for a significant number of students, conferring an advantage of 3.83%. Test performance was positively correlated with quality of interaction. Students with higher levels of test anxiety were most likely to benefit from collaborative testing and to experience the greatest test anxiety reduction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1469787411415077

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 34 · Cited by 33

Authors
Pandey, C., & Kapitanoff, S.
Affiliations
  • Los Angeles Pierce College (US)
  • American Jewish University (US)
Venue
Active Learning in Higher Education
Published
2011-10-19
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
163-174
ISSN
  • 1469-7874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2625
OpenAlex
W1977352453
Cited by
33
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Active Learning in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Keywords
collaborative testing, test anxiety, interaction quality, test performance, university students, peer interaction, anxiety reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review