Cited by 11Education and Critical Thinking DevelopmentEducational Strategies and EpistemologiesEvaluation of Teaching Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sustaining critical minds: How classroom learning cultures shape student thinking dispositions and practices

Open access
Darcie, Isabela, Gray, Robert, Vander Kloet, Marie·2025·Active Learning in Higher Education

Abstract

Critical thinking is routinely identified as a goal for student learning in higher education. Critical thinking, however, is difficult to define or teach, often left as an educational aspiration that is challenging to operationalize and assess. Therefore, many interventions targeting critical thinking are isolated and tend to focus on the development of cognitive skills, providing less attention to students’ dispositions toward applying these skills to different situations. In this study of a redesigned course at a research-intensive university, we query what a dispositional view of thinking can reveal about students’ understanding and experience in an active learning environment. Drawing on student reflection journals and semi-structured interviews with 13 students from two cohorts of the course, we trace how students decide when and how critical thinking is necessary and suitable, as well as when it is perceived to be too demanding or out of place in the classroom. The course included newly introduced, ill-structured problems aimed at competency development. We note that although students employed many critical thinking skills to complete these tasks, the uncertainty related to applying critical thinking to ill-structured problems often conflicted with students’ expectations of classroom instruction. When adapting to unfamiliar instructional practices, students were largely successful in using different approaches to solve problems. However, students’ sensitivity to error a…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/14697874241303508

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Abrami P. C. Bernard R. M. Borokhovski E. Wade A. Surkes M. A. Tamim R. Zhang D. (2008). Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: A stage 1 meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 78(4) 1102–1134. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308326084 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Andreucci-Annunziata P. Riedemann A. Cortés S. Mellado A. Del Río M. T. Vega-Muñoz A. (2023). Conceptualizations and instructional strategies on critical thinking in higher education: A systematic review of systematic reviews. Frontiers in Education 8 Article 1141686. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1141686 · DOI
  3. Bendixen L. D. Rule D. C. (2004). An integrative approach to personal epistemology: A guiding model. Educational Psychologist 39(1) 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3901_7 · DOI
  4. Bezanilla M. J. Fernández-Nogueira D. Poblete M. Galindo-Domínguez H. (2019). Methodologies for teaching-learning critical thinking in higher education: The teacher’s view. Thinking Skills and Creativity 33 Article 100584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100584 · DOI
  5. Braun V. Clarke V. Hayfield N. Terry G. (2019). Thematic analysis. In Liamputtong P. (Ed.) Handbook of research methods in health social sciences (pp. 843–860). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_103 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Chan C. K. Y. Lee K. K. W. (2021). Reflection literacy: A multilevel perspective on the challenges of using reflections in higher education through a comprehensive literature review. Educational Research Review 32 Article 100376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100376 · DOI
  7. Coulson D. Harvey M. (2013). Scaffolding student reflection for experience-based learning: A framework. Teaching in Higher Education 18(4) 401–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.752726 · DOI
  8. Darcie I. Vander Kloet M. Gray R. (2025). Finding your feet in the dark: How making teaching and learning visible enables change in course and assessment design. European Journal of Higher Education 15(2) 206–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2023.2301599 · DOI
  9. Dunne G. (2018). The dispositions of critical thinkers. Think 17(48) 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1477175617000331 · DOI
  10. Dwyer C. P. (2017). Critical thinking: Conceptual perspectives and practical guidelines. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316537411 · DOI
  11. ESU. (2015). Bologna with student eyes 2015: Time to meet the expectations from 1999. ESU European Students’ Union.
  12. ESU. (2020). Bologna with student eyes 2020. ESU European Students’ Union.
  13. Facione P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment, 1(1), 1–23.
  14. Gila K. Ela P. (2015). On the flip side of the coin: Thinking dispositions in learning blogs. American Journal of Educational Research 3(1) 16–19. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-3-1-4 · DOI
  15. Gunawardena M. Wilson K. (2021). Scaffolding students’ critical thinking: A process not an end game. Thinking Skills and Creativity 41 Article 100848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100848 · DOI
  16. Guo L. (2022). How should reflection be supported in higher education? A meta-analysis of reflection interventions. Reflective Practice 23(1) 118–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2021.1995856 · DOI
  17. Hailikari T. Virtanen V. Vesalainen M. Postareff L. (2022). Student perspectives on how different elements of constructive alignment support active learning. Active Learning in Higher Education 23(3) 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787421989160 · DOI
  18. Halpern D. F. Dunn D. S. (2022). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (6th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003025412 · DOI
  19. Huber C. R. Kuncel N. R. (2016). Does college teach critical thinking? A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 86(2) 431–468. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315605917 · DOI
  20. Jackson K., Bazeley P. (2019). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  21. Ku K. Y. L. Ho I. T. (2010). Dispositional factors predicting Chinese students’ critical thinking performance. Personality and Individual Differences 48(1) 54–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.08.015 · DOI
  22. Møller T. E. Kvarøy S. Hannisdal B. (2023). Students’ response to the introduction of active learning and computational practices in a bachelor-level earth science course. Nordic Journal of STEM Education 7(1) 15–26. https://doi.org/10.5324/njsteme.v7i1.4827 · DOI
  23. Perkins D. N., Jay E., Tishman S. (1993). Beyond abilities: A dispositional theory of thinking. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39(1), 1–21.
  24. Perkins D. Ν. Ritchhart R. (2004). When is good thinking? In Dai D. Y. Sternberg R. J. (Eds.) Motivation Emotion and Cognition (pp. 351–384). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610515 · DOI
  25. Puig B. Blanco-Anaya P. Bargiela I. M. Crujeiras-Pérez B. (2019). A systematic review on critical thinking intervention studies in higher education across professional fields. Studies in Higher Education 44(5) 860–869. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1586333 · DOI
  26. Rabello-Mestre A., Otondo F. (2021). Creative dispositions: Teaching for creativity in engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 37(4), 915–924.
  27. Radović S. Firssova O. Hummel H. G. Vermeulen M. (2023). Improving academic performance: Strengthening the relation between theory and practice through prompted reflection. Active Learning in Higher Education 24(2) 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874211014411 · DOI
  28. Saldaña J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE.
  29. Salgado Ramírez A. García Mendoza L. Y. Méndez-Cadena M. E. (2020). La experiencia del estudiantado mediante el uso del diario. ¿Una estrategia para la metacognición? Revista Educación 44 1–34. https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v44i1.38291 · DOI
  30. Stanovich K. E. (2002). Rationality, intelligence, and levels of analysis in cognitive science: Is dysrationalia possible? In Sternberg R. J. (Ed.), Why smart people can be so stupid. (pp. 124–158). Yale University Press.
  31. Thorndahl K. L. Stentoft D. (2020). Thinking critically about critical thinking and problem-based learning in higher education: A scoping review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 14(1). https://doi.org/10.14434/ijpbl.v14i1.28773 · DOI
  32. Thorpe M. (2000). Encouraging students to reflect as part of the assignment process: Student responses and tutor feedback. Active Learning in Higher Education 1(1) 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787400001001006 · DOI
  33. Tishman S. Jay E. Perkins D. N. (1993). Teaching thinking dispositions: From transmission to enculturation. Theory Into Practice 32(3) 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849309543590 · DOI
  34. Wangensteen S. Johansson I. S. Björkström M. E. Nordström G. (2010). Critical thinking dispositions among newly graduated nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing 66(10) 2170–2181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05282.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Darcie, I., Gray, R., & Vander Kloet, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Bergen (NO)
  • University of Bergen, Norway
Corresponding author
Darcie, Isabela
Venue
Active Learning in Higher Education
Published
2024-12-02
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
543-556
ISSN
  • 1469-7874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2625
OpenAlex
W4404978206
Cited by
11
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7
FWCI
13.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Active Learning in Higher Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Keywords
critical thinking, thinking dispositions, ill-structured problems, active learning, student reflection, competence development, course redesign, higher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review