Cited by 200Survey Methodology and NonresponseSurvey Sampling and Estimation TechniquesMobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing

The Effect of Incentives in Web Surveys: Application and Ethical Considerations

Cobanoglu, Cihan, Cobanoglu, Nesrin·2003·International Journal of Market Research

Abstract

Although researchers use internet-based surveys more often than ever in their research, there is little research on the effect of incentives on response rate, speed and cost. This study attempts to fill in some of the blanks by comparing the different incentives offered to respondents of web-based surveys. The results indicate that offering a luggage-tag to each respondent and including them in a draw for a bigger value prize (a personal digital assistant) yields the highest response rate. In terms of response speed, there are no significant differences among each incentive group. The most expensive group in terms of costs was the combination of luggage tag and prize draw.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/147078530304500406

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cobanoglu, C., & Cobanoglu, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Delaware
  • University of Baskent
Venue
International Journal of Market Research
Published
2003-07
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
1-13
ISSN
  • 1470-7853 (ISSN-L)
  • 2515-2173
OpenAlex
W2104187782
Cited by
200
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 17
FWCI
14.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Market Research (publishedVersion)
  • Bilkent University Institutional Repository (Bilkent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
Keywords
survey incentives, online surveys, response rate, response speed, survey costs, prize draw, personal digital assistants, research ethics, respondent motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review