Cited by 318Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesPsychiatric care and mental health services

What is the current state of care for older people with dementia in general hospitals? A literature review

Dewing, Jan, Dijk, Saskia·2016·Dementia

Abstract

This paper summarises a literature review focusing on the literature directly pertaining to the acute care of older people with dementia in general hospitals from 2007 onwards. Following thematic analysis, one overarching theme emerged: the consequences of being in hospital with seven related subthemes. Significantly, this review highlights that overall there remains mostly negative consequences and outcomes for people with dementia when they go into general hospitals. Although not admitted to hospital directly due to dementia, there are usually negative effects on the dementia condition from hospitalisation. The review suggests this is primarily because there is a tension between prioritisation of acute care for existing co-morbidities and person-centred dementia care. This is complicated by insufficient understanding of what constitutes person-centred care in an acute care context and a lack of the requisite knowledge and skills set in health care practitioners. The review also reveals a worrying lack of evidence for the effectiveness of mental health liaison posts and dementia care specialist posts in nursing. Finally, although specialist posts such as liaison and clinical nurse specialists and specialist units/shared care wards can enhance quality of care and reduce adverse consequences of hospitalisation (they do not significantly) impact on reducing length of stay or the cost of care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1471301213520172

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 69 · Cited by 318

Authors
Dewing, J., & Dijk, S.
Affiliations
Canterbury Christ Church University (GB)
Corresponding author
Dewing, Jan
Venue
Dementia
Published
2014-01-23
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
106-124
ISSN
  • 1471-3012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2684
OpenAlex
W2046155744
Cited by
318
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Canterbury Christ Church University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
older adults, acute hospital care, general hospitals, hospitalization, person-centred care, comorbidities, clinical nurse specialists, length of hospital stay, care costs, nursing competencies
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Aged, Delivery of Health Care, Dementia, Hospitalization, Hospitals, General, Humans, Patient-Centered Care, Patient Outcome Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review