Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 18Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesAging, Health, and Disability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Understanding Capacity and Optimizing Meaningful Engagement among Persons Living with Dementia

Open access

Abstract

Meaningful engagement is a key dimension of quality of life among persons living with dementia, yet little is known about how to best to promote it. Guided by grounded theory methods, we present analysis of data collected over a 1-year period in four diverse assisted living (AL) communities as part of the study, “Meaningful Engagement and Quality of Life among Assisted Living Residents with Dementia.” Our aims are to: (a) learn how meaningful engagement is negotiated among AL residents with dementia and their care partners; and (b) identify how to create these positive encounters. Researchers followed 33 residents and 100 care partners (formal and informal) and used participant observation, resident record review, and semi-structured interviews. Data analysis identified “engagement capacity” as central to the negotiation of meaningful engagement. We conclude that understanding and optimizing the engagement capacities of residents, care partners, care convoys, and settings, are essential to creating and enhancing meaningful engagement among persons living with dementia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/14713012231162713

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Morgan J. C., Ahmad W. (2022). Lifting them up: Building person-centered organizations. CSA Journal, 87(2). www.CSA.us
  2. Sebastian K. (2019). Distinguishing between the types of grounded theory: Classical, interpretive and constructivist. Journal for Social Thought, 3(1). https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/jst/article/view/4116
  3. Suárez-González A., Livingston G., Low L. F., Cahill S., Hennelly N., Dawson W. D., Weidner W., Bocchetta M., Ferri C. P., Matias-Guiu J. A., Alladi S., Musyimi C. W., Comas-Herrera A. (2020). Impact and mortality of COVID-19 on people living with dementia: Cross-country report. LTCcovid.org, International Long-Term Care Policy Network, CPECLSE, 19.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kemp, C. L., Bender, A. A., Morgan, J. C., Burgess, E. O., Epps, F. R., Hill, A. M., & Perkins, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Georgia State University (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Kemp, Candace L
Venue
Dementia
Published
2023-03-13
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
854-874
ISSN
  • 1471-3012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2684
OpenAlex
W4324028933
Cited by
18
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG062310)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
meaningful engagement, assisted living, quality of life, care partners, informal caregivers, person-centred care
MeSH terms
Dementia, Humans, Quality of Life, Assisted Living Facilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.