Cited by 137Children's Rights and ParticipationQualitative Research Methods and EthicsParticipatory Visual Research Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Youth participation in qualitative research: Challenges and possibilities

Abstract

Research often excludes youth participants, omitting their social and psychological realities, undermining their rights to participate and benefit from research, and weakening the validity of research. Researchers may be discouraged from including youth due to logistical (e.g. gaining access) or ethical (e.g. coercion risks based on developmental level) concerns. Increased discussion is needed around appropriate methods to use with child and youth participants that manage challenges related to developmental capacities, legal status, power differentials, and unpredictable aspects of qualitative research. This paper pools experiences of six researchers, describing solutions we have developed in studies employing varied qualitative methodologies with varied vulnerable youth subpopulations. We detail successful approaches to access, compensation, consent, assent, and confidentiality. Social work researchers are wellsuited to navigate the challenges, and we share our examples with the aim of facilitating increased youth participation in research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1473325014556792

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 137

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Alderson P, 2005, Ethical Research with Children
  2. British Association of Social Workers, 2012, The code of ethics for social work: Statement of principles
  3. 10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.05.004 · DOI
  4. 10.1080/10911359.2014.884961 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.09.017 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00216.x · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1046/j.1365-2206.2002.00223.x · DOI
  8. 10.1007/BF00942151 · DOI
  9. 10.1037/h0080345 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/0886260506293482 · DOI
  11. David T, 2005, Ethical Research with Children
  12. 10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.05.003 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.001 · DOI
  14. Eder D, 2002, Handbook of Interview Research: Context and method
  15. Elze D, 2008, Research Methods with Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Populations
  16. Farrell A, 2005, Ethical Research with Children
  17. Fisher CB, 1993, Social Policy Report: Society for Research in Child Development, 7, 1
  18. 10.1002/j.2379-3988.2013.tb00074.x · DOI
  19. Fisher CB, 1996, Ethical Issues in Mental Health Research
  20. 10.1177/1473325010364276 · DOI
  21. Flores KS (2008) Youth participatory evaluation: Strategies for engaging young people . San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  22. 10.1002/car.1031 · DOI
  23. 10.1007/978-1-4020-6416-6_2 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.05.015 · DOI
  25. Hester CJ (2004) Adolescent consent: Choosing the right path. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing 27: 27–37. · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1088-145X.2004.00015.x · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.08.015 · DOI
  28. Kutchins H, 1991, Social Work, 36, 106
  29. 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.00936.x · DOI
  30. 10.1177/0969733011401122 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/cs/33.1.47 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02495.x · DOI
  33. MacNaughton G, 2005, Ethical Research with Children
  34. 10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.05.011 · DOI
  35. 10.1177/1473325004048025 · DOI
  36. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0860(199606)10:2<90::AID-CHI14>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.11.003 · DOI
  38. 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31822fc7be · DOI
  39. Mullender A, Hague G, Imam U, et al. (2002) Children's perspectives on domestic violence . London: SAGE. · DOI · Paper page
  40. National Association of Social Workers, 2008, Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers
  41. 10.1016/S1054-139X(99)00068-3 · DOI
  42. Saltzburg S, 2005, Child Welfare for the Twenty-First Century: A Handbook of Practices, Policies, and Programs
  43. 10.1080/15313200903124028 · DOI
  44. Schelbe L (2013) “Some type of way”: An ethnography of youth aging out of the child welfare system. PhD Thesis: University of Pittsburgh, PA.
  45. Staller KM (2008) Children's rights. In: Mizrahi T and Davis L (eds) Encyclopedia of Social Work . 20th ed. Washington, DC: National Association of Social Work Press and Oxford.
  46. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.04.048 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/cs/cdu009 · DOI
  48. Yazejian N, 2013, Social Policy Report, 27, 18
  49. 10.1002/jcop.20044 · DOI
  50. 10.1007/s10464-008-9158-z · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Schelbe, L., Chanmugam, A., Moses, T., Saltzburg, S., Williams, L. R., & Letendre, J.
Affiliations
  • Florida State University (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Schelbe, Lisa
Venue
Qualitative Social Work
Published
2014-11-10
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
504-521
ISSN
  • 1473-3250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3117
OpenAlex
W2055612862
Cited by
137
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
17.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Qualitative Social Work (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
Keywords
youth participation in research, research ethics, informed consent, assent, compensation, confidentiality, access to research participants, vulnerable youth, power imbalance, social work research, researcher experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Youth participation in qualitative research: Challenges and possibilities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1473325014556792
The paper
Schelbe, L., Chanmugam, A., Moses, T., Saltzburg, S., Williams, L. R., & Letendre, J. (2015). Youth participation in qualitative research: Challenges and possibilities. Qualitative Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325014556792