The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Youth participation in qualitative research: Challenges and possibilities
Abstract
Research often excludes youth participants, omitting their social and psychological realities, undermining their rights to participate and benefit from research, and weakening the validity of research. Researchers may be discouraged from including youth due to logistical (e.g. gaining access) or ethical (e.g. coercion risks based on developmental level) concerns. Increased discussion is needed around appropriate methods to use with child and youth participants that manage challenges related to developmental capacities, legal status, power differentials, and unpredictable aspects of qualitative research. This paper pools experiences of six researchers, describing solutions we have developed in studies employing varied qualitative methodologies with varied vulnerable youth subpopulations. We detail successful approaches to access, compensation, consent, assent, and confidentiality. Social work researchers are wellsuited to navigate the challenges, and we share our examples with the aim of facilitating increased youth participation in research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Rapport reduces power imbalances between adult researchers and child participants (Schelbe et al., 2015), creating a more equitable space for dialogue.”
From Virtual Reality Risks for Children in the Metaverse: An Examination through Criminological Perspectives (2026) · cites this paper as Schelbe et al., 2015
In the citing paper
“It is crucial to build trust and rapport (Schelbe et al., 2015).”
From Virtual Reality Risks for Children in the Metaverse: An Examination through Criminological Perspectives (2026) · cites this paper as Schelbe et al., 2015
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 137
Research works printed but not linked: 50
- Alderson P, 2005, Ethical Research with Children
- British Association of Social Workers, 2012, The code of ethics for social work: Statement of principles
- 10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.05.004 · DOI
- 10.1080/10911359.2014.884961 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.09.017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00216.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1365-2206.2002.00223.x · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00942151 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0080345 · DOI
- 10.1177/0886260506293482 · DOI
- David T, 2005, Ethical Research with Children
- 10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.05.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.001 · DOI
- Eder D, 2002, Handbook of Interview Research: Context and method
- Elze D, 2008, Research Methods with Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Populations
- Farrell A, 2005, Ethical Research with Children
- Fisher CB, 1993, Social Policy Report: Society for Research in Child Development, 7, 1
- 10.1002/j.2379-3988.2013.tb00074.x · DOI
- Fisher CB, 1996, Ethical Issues in Mental Health Research
- 10.1177/1473325010364276 · DOI
- Flores KS (2008) Youth participatory evaluation: Strategies for engaging young people . San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- 10.1002/car.1031 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4020-6416-6_2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.05.015 · DOI
- Hester CJ (2004) Adolescent consent: Choosing the right path. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing 27: 27–37. · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1088-145X.2004.00015.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.08.015 · DOI
- Kutchins H, 1991, Social Work, 36, 106
- 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.00936.x · DOI
- 10.1177/0969733011401122 · DOI
- 10.1093/cs/33.1.47 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02495.x · DOI
- MacNaughton G, 2005, Ethical Research with Children
- 10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.05.011 · DOI
- 10.1177/1473325004048025 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0860(199606)10:2<90::AID-CHI14>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
- 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.11.003 · DOI
- 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31822fc7be · DOI
- Mullender A, Hague G, Imam U, et al. (2002) Children's perspectives on domestic violence . London: SAGE. · DOI · Paper page
- National Association of Social Workers, 2008, Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers
- 10.1016/S1054-139X(99)00068-3 · DOI
- Saltzburg S, 2005, Child Welfare for the Twenty-First Century: A Handbook of Practices, Policies, and Programs
- 10.1080/15313200903124028 · DOI
- Schelbe L (2013) “Some type of way”: An ethnography of youth aging out of the child welfare system. PhD Thesis: University of Pittsburgh, PA.
- Staller KM (2008) Children's rights. In: Mizrahi T and Davis L (eds) Encyclopedia of Social Work . 20th ed. Washington, DC: National Association of Social Work Press and Oxford.
- 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.04.048 · DOI
- 10.1093/cs/cdu009 · DOI
- Yazejian N, 2013, Social Policy Report, 27, 18
- 10.1002/jcop.20044 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10464-008-9158-z · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Schelbe, L., Chanmugam, A., Moses, T., Saltzburg, S., Williams, L. R., & Letendre, J.
- Affiliations
- Florida State University (US)
- The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
- University of Connecticut (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schelbe, Lisa
- Venue
- Qualitative Social Work
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-11-10
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 504-521
- ISSN
- 1473-3250 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3117
- OpenAlex
- W2055612862
- Cited by
- 137
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 17.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Qualitative Social Work (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
- Keywords
- youth participation in research, research ethics, informed consent, assent, compensation, confidentiality, access to research participants, vulnerable youth, power imbalance, social work research, researcher experience
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Youth participation in qualitative research: Challenges and possibilities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1473325014556792
- The paper
- Schelbe, L., Chanmugam, A., Moses, T., Saltzburg, S., Williams, L. R., & Letendre, J. (2015). Youth participation in qualitative research: Challenges and possibilities. Qualitative Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325014556792