The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attractive Women Want it All: Good Genes, Economic Investment, Parenting Proclivities, and Emotional Commitment
Open accessAbstract
The current research tests the hypothesis that women have an evolved mate value calibration adaptation that functions to raise or lower their standards in a long-term mate according to their own mate value. A woman's physical attractiveness is a cardinal component of women's mate value. We correlated observer-assessed physical attractiveness (face, body, and overall) with expressed preferences for four clusters of mate characteristics ( N = 214): (1) hypothesized good-gene indicators (e.g., masculinity, sexiness); (2) hypothesized good investment indicators (e.g., potential income); (3) good parenting indicators (e.g., desire for home and children), and (4) good partner indicators (e.g., being a loving partner). Results supported the hypothesis that high mate value women, as indexed by observer-judged physical attractiveness, expressed elevated standards for all four clusters of mate characteristics. Discussion focuses on potential design features of the hypothesized mate-value calibration adaptation, and suggests an important modification of the trade-off model of women's mating. A minority of women—notably those low in mate value who are able to escape male mate guarding and the manifold costs of an exposed infidelity—will pursue a mixed mating strategy, obtaining investment from one man and good genes from an extra-pair copulation partner (as the trade-off model predicts). Since the vast majority of women secure genes and direct benefits from the same man, however, most women will attempt to secure the best combination of all desired qualities from the same man.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures
Buss, D. M. (1989) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00023992 · Cited by 4,484
Self-citationSexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.2.204 · Cited by 4,253
Self-citation(1979) · Cited by 2,524
The evolution of human sexuality
Wilson, G. (1980) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(80)90074-4 · Cited by 2,505
The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism
Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0000337x · Cited by 1,819
(2000) · Cited by 1,630
The evolution of desire: strategies of human mating
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-1010 · Cited by 1,545
Preferences in human mate selection.
Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.559 · Cited by 1,432
Self-citationBingwu, Q. (2024) · The ECPH Encyclopedia of Psychology · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-6000-2_884-1 · Cited by 1,417
Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio
Singh, D. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.293 · Cited by 1,334
Cited by
Contrasting Computational Models of Mate Preference Integration Across 45 Countries
Conroy-Beam, D., Buss, D. M., Asao, K., Sorokowska, A., Sorokowski, P., Aavik, T., Akello, G., Alhabahba, M. M., Alm, C., Amjad, N., et al. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-52748-8 · Cited by 1,770
Self-citationMate Preferences and Their Behavioral Manifestations
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2019) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103408 · Cited by 503
Self-citationEvolutionary psychology: Controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations.
Confer, J. C., Easton, J. A., Fleischman, D. S., Goetz, C. D., Lewis, D. M. G., Perilloux, C., & Buss, D. M. (2010) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0018413 · Cited by 482
Self-citationHow Sexually Dimorphic Are Human Mate Preferences?
Conroy-Beam, D., Buss, D. M., Pham, M. N., & Shackelford, T. K. (2015) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167215590987 · Cited by 187
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K.
- Venue
- Evolutionary Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-01-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1474-7049 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2117103822
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 10.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attractive Women Want it All: Good Genes, Economic Investment, Parenting Proclivities, and Emotional Commitment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/147470490800600116
- The paper
- Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Attractive Women Want it All: Good Genes, Economic Investment, Parenting Proclivities, and Emotional Commitment. Evolutionary Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490800600116
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.