The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vibration-based Damage Identification Methods: A Review and Comparative Study
Abstract
A comprehensive review on modal parameter-based damage identification methods for beam- or plate-type structures is presented, and the damage identification algorithms in terms of signal processing are particularly emphasized. Based on the vibration features, the damage identification methods are classified into four major categories: natural frequency-based methods, mode shape-based methods, curvature mode shape-based methods, and methods using both mode shapes and frequencies, and their merits and drawbacks are discussed. It is observed that most mode shape-based and curvature mode shape-based methods only focus on damage localization. In order to precisely locate the damage, the mode shape-based methods have to rely on optimization algorithms or signal processing techniques; while the curvature mode shape-based methods are in general a very effective type of damage localization algorithms. As an implementation, a comparative study of five extensively-used damage detection algorithms for beam-type structures is conducted to evaluate and demonstrate the validity and effectiveness of the signal processing algorithms. This brief review aims to help the readers in identifying starting points for research in vibration-based damage identification and structural health monitoring and guides researchers and practitioners in better implementing available damage identification algorithms and signal processing methods for beam- or plate-type structures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Los Alamos National Lab., N. (. S., Doebling, S., USDOE, W., Farrar, C., Prime, M., & Shevitz, D. (1996) · doi:10.2172/249299 · Cited by 2,899 · cited 2×
“[1] presented an extensive review of vibration-based damage detection methods up to 1996.”
BackgroundMethod
Cited by
Hou, R., & Xia, Y. (2021) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115741 · Cited by 674
Malekloo, A., Ozer, E., AlHamaydeh, M., & Girolami, M. (2022) · Structural Health Monitoring · doi:10.1177/14759217211036880 · Cited by 607
Nsengiyumva, W., Zhong, S., Lin, J., Zhang, Q., Zhong, J., & Huang, Y. (2021) · Composite Structures · doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112951 · Cited by 325
Structural Health Monitoring for Advanced Composite Structures: A Review
Güemes, A., Fernandez-Lopez, A., Pozo, A. R., & Sierra-Pérez, J. (2020) · Journal of Composites Science · doi:10.3390/jcs4010013 · Cited by 298
Sarrafi, A., Mao, Z., Niezrecki, C., & Poozesh, P. (2018) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2018.01.050 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, W., & Qiao, P.
- Venue
- Structural Health Monitoring
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-04-20
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-111
- ISSN
- 1475-9217 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3168
- OpenAlex
- W2130175225
- Cited by
- 2,045
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 119.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vibration-based Damage Identification Methods: A Review and Comparative Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1475921710365419
- The paper
- Fan, W., & Qiao, P. (2011). Vibration-based Damage Identification Methods: A Review and Comparative Study. Structural Health Monitoring. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921710365419
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.