The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computer vision and deep learning–based data anomaly detection method for structural health monitoring
Abstract
The widespread application of sophisticated structural health monitoring systems in civil infrastructures produces a large volume of data. As a result, the analysis and mining of structural health monitoring data have become hot research topics in the field of civil engineering. However, the harsh environment of civil structures causes the data measured by structural health monitoring systems to be contaminated by multiple anomalies, which seriously affect the data analysis results. This is one of the main barriers to automatic real-time warning, because it is difficult to distinguish the anomalies caused by structural damage from those related to incorrect data. Existing methods for data cleansing mainly focus on noise filtering, whereas the detection of incorrect data requires expertise and is very time-consuming. Inspired by the real-world manual inspection process, this article proposes a computer vision and deep learning–based data anomaly detection method. In particular, the framework of the proposed method includes two steps: data conversion by data visualization, and the construction and training of deep neural networks for anomaly classification. This process imitates human biological vision and logical thinking. In the data visualization step, the time series signals are transformed into image vectors that are plotted piecewise in grayscale images. In the second step, a training dataset consisting of randomly selected and manually labeled image vectors is input into a deep neural network or a cluster of deep neural networks, which are trained via techniques termed stacked autoencoders and greedy layer-wise training. The trained deep neural networks can be used to detect potential anomalies in large amounts of unchecked structural health monitoring data. To illustrate the training procedure and validate the performance of the proposed method, acceleration data from the structural health monitoring system of a real long-span bridge in China are employed. The results show that the multi-pattern anomalies of the data can be automatically detected with high accuracy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y.-W. (2006) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 · Cited by 16,336
A scaled conjugate gradient algorithm for fast supervised learning
Møller, M. F. (1993) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(05)80056-5 · Cited by 4,052
Deep Learning‐Based Crack Damage Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks
Cha, Y., Choi, W., & Büyüköztürk, O. (2017) · Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering · doi:10.1111/mice.12263 · Cited by 3,295
Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis
Härdle, W., & Simar, L. (2003) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-05802-2 · Cited by 2,263
A review of structural health monitoring literature 1996-2001
Farrar, C. R., Czarnecki, J. J., Hoon Sohn, A., & Hemez, F. (2002) · Cited by 1,496
Koch, C., Georgieva, K., Kasireddy, V., Akinci, B., & Fieguth, P. (2015) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2015.01.008 · Cited by 1,065
Failure diagnosis using deep belief learning based health state classification
Tamilselvan, P., & Wang, P. (2013) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2013.02.022 · Cited by 630
Buckland, W. R. (1979) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/jors.1979.165 · Cited by 562
Autoassociative neural networks
Kramer, M. A. (1992) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/0098-1354(92)80051-a · Cited by 532
Cited by
Baduge, S. K., Thilakarathna, S., Perera, J. S., Arashpour, M., Sharafi, P., Teodosio, B., Shringi, A., & Mendis, P. (2022) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104440 · Cited by 1,007
“AI based SHM techniques have been used for: general SHM [189], multi-level damage detection [190], non-contact assessment of deflection [191], corrosion detection [192], concrete surface bug hole recognition [193], concrete crack detection [194], concrete spalling [195], steel crack detection…”
MethodDorafshan, S., Thomas, R. J., & Maguire, M. (2018) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.011 · Cited by 774
Azimi, M., Eslamlou, A., & Pekcan, G. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20102778 · Cited by 769
Hou, R., & Xia, Y. (2021) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115741 · Cited by 674
Anomaly detection of defects on concrete structures with the convolutional autoencoder
Chow, J. K., Su, Z., Wu, J., Tan, P. S., Mao, X., & Wang, Y. H. (2020) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2020.101105 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Bao, Y., Tang, Z., Li, H., & Zhang, Y.
- Venue
- Structural Health Monitoring
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-02-19
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 401-421
- ISSN
- 1475-9217 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3168
- OpenAlex
- W2791957585
- Cited by
- 616
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 28.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computer vision and deep learning–based data anomaly detection method for structural health monitoring. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1475921718757405
- The paper
- Bao, Y., Tang, Z., Li, H., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Computer vision and deep learning–based data anomaly detection method for structural health monitoring. Structural Health Monitoring. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921718757405
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.