The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Explaining the Resurrection: Conflicting Convictions
Abstract
Although explanations for the earliest Christian proclamation of Jesus' resurrection vary, certain standard arguments appear again and again. The present article introduces those explanations and those arguments as well as the essays in this theme issue of JSHJ, with a view to clarifying what they add to the traditional discussion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Allison, D.
- Affiliations
- Pittsburgh Theological Seminary (US)
- Corresponding author
- Allison, Dale
- Venue
- Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 117-133
- ISSN
- 1476-8690 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-5197
- OpenAlex
- W2094848492
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 7.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Keywords
- resurrection of Jesus, early Christian proclamation, historical Jesus, historical Jesus scholarship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Explaining the Resurrection: Conflicting Convictions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1476869005060235
- The paper
- Allison, D. (2005). Explaining the Resurrection: Conflicting Convictions. Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476869005060235
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
