CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 38Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCrime Patterns and InterventionsCriminal Justice and Penology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Female pathways to crime and prison: Challenging the (US) gendered pathways perspective

Nuytiens, An, Christiaens, Jenneke·2016·European Journal of Criminology
DOI 10.1177/1477370815608879
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Because the gendered pathways perspective was developed and tested primarily in the United States, the applicability of the model in European contexts remains questionable. Also, it is unclear how adult-onset female offenders fit the pathways perspective. In this article we explore the life histories and the pathways to crime and prison of female prisoners in Belgium. Because many participants were late starters, our findings are particularly informative for female adult-onset pathways. These adult-onset pathways show both similarities to and differences from the US gendered pathways perspective. Hence, this pathway might be considered as another gendered pathway to crime and prison, alongside those put forward in mainly US research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1477370815608879

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Covington S, 2007, Female Offenders: Clinical Perspectives and Effective Interventions, 135
  2. Daly K, 1992, Southern California Review of Law and Women’s Studies, 2, 11
  3. Medlicott D, 2007, Handbook on Prisons, 245
  4. Miller JB, 1986, What do we mean by relationships? Work in Progress No. 22
  5. Nijhof G, 2000, Levensverhalen. Over de methode van autobiografisch onderzoek in de sociologie
  6. Nuytiens A, 2008, Panopticon, 29, 40
  7. Nuytiens A, 2011, Het levensverhaal en (jeugd)delinquente traject van vrouwelijke gedetineerden
  8. Nuytiens A, 2010, Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 52, 394
  9. Nuytiens A, 2012, Temida, Journal of Victimology, Human Rights and Gender, 15, 7
  10. Nuytiens A, 2015, Lives of Incarcerated Women: An International Perspective, 32
  11. Nuytiens A, 2009, Fatik, 121, 5
  12. Wong T, 2009, Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 51, 246

Cited by

See all 38

Related

Metadata

Authors
Nuytiens, A., & Christiaens, J.
Affiliations
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Corresponding author
Nuytiens, An
ORCID
Nuytiens, An
Venue
European Journal of Criminology
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2015-10-07
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
195-213
ISSN
  • 1477-3708 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2609
DOI
10.1177/1477370815608879
OpenAlex
W2340316549
Cited by
38
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • European Journal of Criminology (publishedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
women offenders, women prisoners, life history (social science method), Belgium

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review