The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Epistemic agency
Abstract
Virtue epistemologists hold that knowledge results from the display of epistemic virtues – open-mindedness, rigor, sensitivity to evidence, and the like. But epistemology cannot rest satisfied with a list of the virtues. What is wanted is a criterion for being an epistemic virtue. An extension of a formulation of Kant’s categorical imperative yields such a criterion. Epistemic agents should think of themselves as, and act as, legislating members of a realm of epistemic ends: they make the rules, devise the methods, and set the standards that bind them. The epistemic virtues are the traits of intellectual character that equip them to do so. Students then not only need to learn the standards, methods, and rules of the various disciplines, they also need to learn to think of themselves as, and how to behave as, legislating members of epistemic realms who are responsible for what they and their fellows believe. This requires teaching them to respect reasons, and to take themselves to be responsible for formulating reasons their peers can respect.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It also draws upon Epistemic Agency Theory [30, 76], emphasizing that knowledge ultimately depends on human judgment, evaluation, and responsibility.”
From Developing the HAKI model as a conceptual framework for AI-assisted academic research (2026) · cites this paper as [30]
In the citing paper
“It also draws upon Epistemic Agency Theory [30, 76], emphasizing that knowledge ultimately depends on human judgment, evaluation, and responsibility.”
From Developing the HAKI model as a conceptual framework for AI-assisted academic research (2026) · cites this paper as [30]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- 10.7551/mitpress/1554.001.0001 · DOI
- Axtell G, 1997, American Philosophical Quarterly, 34, 410
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604074.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1477878511419559 · DOI
- Locke J, 1959, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding
- Kant I, 1981, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals
- 10.1017/CBO9781139174503.011 · DOI
- Plato, 1976, Meno
- 10.1017/S0031819100021045 · DOI
- Rowling JK, 1999, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297023.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-94-009-1942-6_2 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9781139165860.009 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Developing the HAKI model as a conceptual framework for AI-assisted academic research
Shahini, A. (2026) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-026-02041-4
“It also draws upon Epistemic Agency Theory [30, 76], emphasizing that knowledge ultimately depends on human judgment, evaluation, and responsibility.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Elgin, C. Z.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Elgin, Catherine Z
- ORCID
- Elgin, Catherine Z
- Venue
- Theory and Research in Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-05-20
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 135-152
- ISSN
- 1477-8785 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3192
- OpenAlex
- W4252766850
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 14.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Theory and Research in Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Education, Philosophy, and Society
- Keywords
- epistemic agency, intellectual virtues, virtue epistemology, Kant's categorical imperative, intellectual character, epistemic responsibility, epistemic norms, epistemic methods
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epistemic agency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1477878513485173
- The paper
- Elgin, C. Z. (2013). Epistemic agency. Theory and Research in Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878513485173