Cited by 110Epistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsEducational Strategies and EpistemologiesEducation, Philosophy, and Society

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Epistemic agency

Elgin, Catherine Z·2013·Theory and Research in Education

Abstract

Virtue epistemologists hold that knowledge results from the display of epistemic virtues – open-mindedness, rigor, sensitivity to evidence, and the like. But epistemology cannot rest satisfied with a list of the virtues. What is wanted is a criterion for being an epistemic virtue. An extension of a formulation of Kant’s categorical imperative yields such a criterion. Epistemic agents should think of themselves as, and act as, legislating members of a realm of epistemic ends: they make the rules, devise the methods, and set the standards that bind them. The epistemic virtues are the traits of intellectual character that equip them to do so. Students then not only need to learn the standards, methods, and rules of the various disciplines, they also need to learn to think of themselves as, and how to behave as, legislating members of epistemic realms who are responsible for what they and their fellows believe. This requires teaching them to respect reasons, and to take themselves to be responsible for formulating reasons their peers can respect.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1477878513485173

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. 10.7551/mitpress/1554.001.0001 · DOI
  2. Axtell G, 1997, American Philosophical Quarterly, 34, 410
  3. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604074.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1177/1477878511419559 · DOI
  5. Locke J, 1959, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding
  6. Kant I, 1981, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals
  7. 10.1017/CBO9781139174503.011 · DOI
  8. Plato, 1976, Meno
  9. 10.1017/S0031819100021045 · DOI
  10. Rowling JK, 1999, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
  11. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297023.001.0001 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/978-94-009-1942-6_2 · DOI
  13. 10.1017/CBO9781139165860.009 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 110

Metadata

Authors
Elgin, C. Z.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Elgin, Catherine Z
Venue
Theory and Research in Education
Published
2013-05-20
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
135-152
ISSN
  • 1477-8785 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3192
OpenAlex
W4252766850
Cited by
110
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
14.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Theory and Research in Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Education, Philosophy, and Society
Keywords
epistemic agency, intellectual virtues, virtue epistemology, Kant's categorical imperative, intellectual character, epistemic responsibility, epistemic norms, epistemic methods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epistemic agency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1477878513485173
The paper
Elgin, C. Z. (2013). Epistemic agency. Theory and Research in Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878513485173