The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The General Method of Theory-Building Research in Applied Disciplines
Abstract
The problem and the solution. One of the challenges of theory-building research in applied disciplines is making the logic used to build the theory explicit and accessible to the user of the developed theory. Although different methods of theory building advocate different theory-building research processes, there is an inherently generic nature to theory building. This chapter acts as a foundation for the journal by highlighting strategies commonly used in building theory and offers a generic, five-phase method of theory-building research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building
Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1990.4310758 · Cited by 1,426
Longitudinal Field Research Methods for Studying Processes of Organizational Change
van de Ven, A. H., & Huber, G. P. (1990) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1.3.213 · Cited by 832
Cited by
Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization
Duchek, S. (2020) · Business Research · doi:10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7 · Cited by 2,027
“The result of this process is ‘‘an explicit, informed, conceptual framework’’ (Lynham 2002, p. 232) of organizational resilience that fosters a comprehensive understanding of the resilience phenomenon as well as underlying dynamics (see Meredith 1993; Jabareen 2009; Burnard and Bhamra 2011).”
BackgroundOrganisational resilience: development of a conceptual framework for organisational responses
Burnard, K., & Bhamra, R. (2011) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.563827 · Cited by 704
Human-centered design of work systems in the transition to industry 4.0
Kadir, B. A., & Broberg, O. (2021) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103334 · Cited by 177
Shuck, B., Alagaraja, M., Immekus, J., Cumberland, D., & Honeycutt‐Elliott, M. (2019) · Human Resource Development Quarterly · doi:10.1002/hrdq.21369 · Cited by 80
Theory-oriented software engineering
Stol, K.-J., & Fitzgerald, B. (2015) · Science of Computer Programming · doi:10.1016/j.scico.2014.11.010 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Lynham, S. A.
- Venue
- Advances in Developing Human Resources
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-08-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 221-241
- ISSN
- 1523-4223 (ISSN-L)
- 0000-0000
- OpenAlex
- W2135201762
- Cited by
- 443
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
