Conceptualizing the Harm done by Rape: Applications of Trauma Theory to Experiences of Sexual Assault
Abstract
Based on a review of theory and evidence, this article highlights the limitations of trauma response models and applications of posttraumatic stress to characterize the experiences of women who are raped. There are two primary problems with trauma response theories. First, traditional notions of trauma are likely too narrow to accurately capture the complexities of women's experiences of sexual violence in a gendered society. Second, the symptoms emphasized by clinical applications of the trauma model may legitimate one sociocultural manifestation of distress while excluding others. Alternative conceptualizations are presented to stimulate more ecologically grounded and culturally inclusive study of sexual violence. Using the rape of women as an example, this article illustrates the limitations of Western views of trauma and encourages researchers and practitioners to expand notions of survivors' responses to painful events.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Rape stigma and social support seem to be closely interrelated with increased rape stigma associated with a decreased ability to access and rely on social support.
“Rape stigma and social support seem to be closely interrelated with increased rape stigma associated with a decreased ability to access and rely on social support (Moor and Farchi, 2011;Carretta et al., 2016a;Wasco, 2003).”
From Risk and protective factors affecting the symptom trajectory of posttraumatic stress disorder post-rape (2022) · cites this paper as Wasco, 2003
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 89 · Cited by 109
- Authors
- Wasco, S. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wasco, Sharon M.
- Venue
- Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 309-322
- ISSN
- 1524-8380 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8324
- OpenAlex
- W2099510956
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 0.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trauma Violence & Abuse (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Keywords
- rape, sexual violence, post-traumatic stress, women survivors, gender, cultural inclusion, ecological perspective
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Attitude of Health Personnel, Community Mental Health Services, Counseling, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Rape, Risk Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Women's Health, Battered Women, Crime Victims
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review