The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reproductive Coercion: A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
Reproductive coercion is a behavior that interferes with the autonomous decision-making of a woman, with regard to reproductive health. It may take the form of birth control sabotage, pregnancy coercion, or controlling the outcome of a pregnancy. The objectives of this article are to address the questions: (1) What is known about reproductive coercion, its prevalence, and correlates? (2) What strategies do women use to preserve their reproductive autonomy when experiencing reproductive coercion? (3) What interventions are effective to decrease reproductive coercion? In this review of 27 research studies, 12 contained findings regarding the general phenomenon of reproductive coercion and 19 contained findings about at least one component of reproductive coercion. Additionally, 11 studies contained findings related to the intersection of intimate partner violence (IPV) and reproductive coercion, 6 presented data on strategies women use to resist reproductive coercion, and 3 included intervention data. Variation in measurement makes synthesis of prevalence and correlate data challenging. The reviewed literature presents reproductive coercion as a phenomenon that disproportionately affects women experiencing concurrent IPV, women of lower socioeconomic status, single women, and African American, Latina and multiracial women. Women who experience reproductive coercion were found to present frequently for certain health services. Most data on reproductive coercion are descriptive, and there is need for further research to examine the co-occurrence with related phenomena such as IPV and unintended pregnancy. More research is also needed on the strategies women use to resist reproductive coercion as well as interventions aimed at survivors and perpetrators of reproductive coercion and health-care providers who encounter them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006 · Cited by 10,578
Vandenbroucke, J. P., von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Gøtzsche, P. C., Mulrow, C. D., Pocock, S. J., Poole, C., Schlesselman, J. J., Egger, M., & Initiative, F. T. S. (2007) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297 · Cited by 8,613
Coercion in Intimate Partner Violence: Toward a New Conceptualization
Dutton, M. A., & Goodman, L. A. (2005) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-005-4196-6 · Cited by 514 · cited 2×
“…domestic violence, intimate partner violence In a violent intimate partner relationship, the underlying dynamic is often of an abuser utilizing a variety of tactics in an effort to create vulnerabilities and to achieve power over and coercive control of his partner (Dutton & Goodman, 2005).”
BackgroundReasons U.S. women have abortions: quantitative and qualitative perspectives
Finer, L. B., Frohwirth, L. F., Dauphinee, L. A., Singh, S., & Moore, A. M. (2005) · Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health · doi:10.1363/3711005 · Cited by 433
Does Physical Intimate Partner Violence Affect Sexual Health?: A Systematic Review
Coker, A. L. (2007) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838007301162 · Cited by 401
Economic Abuse in the Lives of Women Abused by an Intimate Partner: A Qualitative Study
Sanders, C. K. (2015) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801214564167 · Cited by 155
Differences in Social Network Structure and Support Among Women in Violent Relationships
Katerndahl, D., Burge, S., Ferrer, R., Becho, J., & Wood, R. (2013) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260512469103 · Cited by 94
Cited by
Eaton, A. A., Ramjee, D., & Saunders, J. F. (2023) · Victims & Offenders · doi:10.1080/15564886.2021.2022057 · Cited by 40
Rape and Sexual Coercion Related Pregnancy in the United States
D'Angelo, D. V., Liu, Y., Basile, K. C., Smith, S. G., Chen, J., Friar, N. W., & Stevens, M. (2024) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2023.11.001 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Grace, K. T., & Anderson, J. C.
- Venue
- Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-08-16
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 371-390
- ISSN
- 1524-8380 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8324
- OpenAlex
- W2515366146
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 2.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reproductive Coercion: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1524838016663935
- The paper
- Grace, K. T., & Anderson, J. C. (2018). Reproductive Coercion: A Systematic Review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016663935
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.