The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adult-Perpetrated Animal Abuse: A Systematic Literature Review
Abstract
Adults perpetrate the majority of animal abuse incidents yet clinicians are left with very little evidence base to advance/enhance their practice. The purpose of this systematic review is to synthesize and evaluate the current literature on adult-perpetrated animal abuse and to identify the etiological factors related to this type of offending. Twenty-three studies met the specific inclusion criteria but most importantly, they examined the characteristics of adult perpetrators of animal abuse. The findings from this review were demarcated by sample type: (1) Participants were the perpetrators of the animal abuse or held offense-supportive attitudes and (2) participants were victims of intimate partner violence reporting incidents of animal abuse perpetrated by their partner. From the perpetrator perspective, there were key developmental (i.e., maladaptive parenting strategies), behavioral (such as varied offending behaviors), and psychological (e.g., callousness, empathy deficits) factors highlighted in the literature. Finally, in the context of intimate partner violence, findings indicated that perpetrators abuse animals to control, coerce, intimidate, and/or manipulate their victims (this effect is moderated by the victims’ emotional attachment to their pet). This review inherently underlines treatment targets that could achieve greater clinical gains, but we also conclude that more empirical and theoretical work is needed in order to set an agenda that prioritizes future research and effective practice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Finally, there are several examples of negative effects of the human–animal relationship, which include cruel acts and violence towards animals, with various characteristics and different degrees of severity (e.g., [66,81,99,100,101]).”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [101]
Citations
Cites
SAUNDERS, J. B., AASLAND, O. G., BABOR, T. F., DE LA FUENTE, J. R., & GRANT, M. (1993) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x · Cited by 13,597
Social cognitive theory of self-regulation
Bandura, A. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-l · Cited by 6,875
Dehumanization: An integrative review
Haslam, N. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4 · Cited by 2,919
Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships
Downey, G., & Feldman, S. I. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1327 · Cited by 2,110
Wakabayashi, A., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Goldenfeld, N., Delaney, J., Fine, D., Smith, R., & Weil, L. (2006) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.03.017 · Cited by 387
Research works printed but not linked: 67
- Allen M., 2006, Practice: Social Work in Action, 18, 167, 10.1080/09503150600904060 · DOI
- 10.1080/1068316X.2014.999064 · DOI
- 10.1177/088626099014009004 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279393787002105 · DOI
- Ascione F. R., 1995, Battered partner shelter survey (BPSS)
- 10.1300/J135v01n01_06 · DOI
- 10.1177/1077801207299201 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-6566(88)90036-0 · DOI
- Beach S. R. H., 2001, Emotional Toughness Scale
- Boat B. W., 1999, Child abuse, domestic violence, and animal abuse: Linking the circles of compassion for prevention and intervention, 83
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199803/04)28:2<257::AID-EJSP871>3.0.CO;2-1 · DOI
- 10.1002/1098-2337(1992)18:2<95::AID-AB2480180203>3.0.CO;2-5 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1999)25:6<435::AID-AB4>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI
- 10.2752/089279304786991864 · DOI
- 10.1177/154193120504901311 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0047358 · DOI · Paper page
- Davis M. H., 1980, JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85
- DeViney E., 1983, International Journal for the Study of Animal Problems, 4, 321
- Eisenberg N., 2011, Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications, 263
- 10.1163/156853012X614341 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1077801214549641 · DOI
- 10.1177/0886260512441080 · DOI
- Flynn C. P., 1999, Society and Animals, 14, 55
- 10.1177/10778010022181778 · DOI
- 10.1163/156853000511032 · DOI
- 10.1177/10778010022181778 · DOI
- 10.1186/2046-0481-61-10-658 · DOI
- 10.1177/1079063211412390 · DOI
- 10.1177/1079063208322495 · DOI
- Giner-Sorolla R., 2012, Extremism and the psychology of uncertainty, 165
- Goldberg L. R., 1999, Personality psychology in Europe, 7, 7
- 10.1515/9781503621794 · DOI · Paper page
- Green G. S., 2002, Society & Animals: Journal of Human-Animal Studies, 10, 5, 10.1163/156853002760030851 · DOI
- 10.1057/9781137284549 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5406/janimalethics.4.2.0061 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1163/156853008X323385 · DOI
- Gupta M., 2001, Aggression Toward Animals Scale
- Gupta M., 2002, Animal Expagg Scale
- Gupta M., 2002, Emotional Toughness Toward Animals Scale
- Gupta M., 2002, Rejection Sensitivity Toward Animals Scale
- 10.1177/0886260513487994 · DOI
- Haslam N., 2014, Humanness and dehumanization, 34
- 10.2752/089279304785643195 · DOI
- 10.1163/1568530042880677 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279306785593847 · DOI
- 10.1163/156853007X187081 · DOI
- 10.1521/pedi.1988.2.3.229 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-94-009-4998-0_3 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb00908.x · DOI
- 10.1300/J135v04n01_02 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1980.tb00730.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0272-7358(94)90017-5 · DOI
- 10.2752/175303709X457595 · DOI
- 10.1177/088626001016006003 · DOI
- Raupp C. D., 1999, Society & Animals: Journal of Human-Animal Studies, 7, 141, 10.1163/156853099X00040 · DOI
- Rowan A. N., 1999, Child abuse, domestic violence and animal abuse, 328
- 10.1177/0886260507303734 · DOI
- 10.1300/J039v09n04_04 · DOI
- 10.2307/351733 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/019251396017003001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2089195 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2011.00843.x · DOI
- 10.1177/0886260511403763 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.04.011 · DOI
- 10.1177/0886260508314309 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.avb.2013.10.002 · DOI
- Watson D., 1994, The PANAS-X: Manual for Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prato-Previde, E., Basso Ricci, E., & Colombo, E. S. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12202835 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Alleyne, E., & Parfitt, C.
- Affiliations
- School of Psychology, Keynes College, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, United Kingdom
- Venue
- Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-05-24
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 344-357
- ISSN
- 1524-8380
- 1552-8324
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review