Cited by 275Social Work Education and PracticeHealth Policy Implementation ScienceHuman Resource Development and Performance Evaluation

Systematic Review of Evaluations of Trauma-Informed Organizational Interventions That Include Staff Trainings

Purtle, Jonathan·2020·Trauma, Violence, & Abuse

Abstract

Enthusiasm for trauma-informed practice has increased dramatically. Organizational interventions that train staff about trauma-informed practice are frequently used to promote trauma-informed systems change, but evidence about these interventions’ effects has not been integrated. A systematic review was conducted of studies that evaluated the effects of organizational interventions that included a “trauma-informed” staff training component. A search was conducted in July 2017 and studies were identified in PubMed, PsycINFO, and the Published International Literature on Traumatic Stress database, limited to articles published in English after 2000. Six hundred and thirty-two articles were screened and 23 met inclusion criteria. Seventeen studies used a single group pretest/posttest design, five used a randomized controlled design, and one used a quasi-experimental design with a nonrandomized control group. The duration of trauma-informed trainings ranged from 1 hr to multiple days. Staff knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to trauma-informed practice improved significantly pre-/posttraining in 12 studies and 7 studies found that these improvements were retained at ≥1month follow-up. Eight studies assessed the effects of a trauma-informed organizational intervention on client outcomes, five of which found statistically significantly improvements. The strength of evidence about trauma-informed organization intervention effects is limited by an abundance of single group, pretest/posttest designs with short follow-up periods, unsophisticated analytic approaches, and inconsistent use of assessment instruments. In addition to addressing these methodological limitations, priorities for future research include understanding intervention effects on clients’ perceptions of care and the mechanisms through which changes in staff knowledge and attitudes about trauma-informed practice influence client outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1524838018791304

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CARE Evaluation addressed nearly all of the recommendations for measurement, analysis, design, and reporting of evaluations of trauma-informed organizational interventions in Purtle's systematic review.

    “The CARE Evaluation also addressed nearly all of the recommendations for the measurement, analysis, design, and reporting of evaluations of trauma-informed organizational interventions in Purtle's (2018, p. 13) systematic review.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Purtle, J.
Affiliations
Drexel University (US)
Corresponding author
Purtle, Jonathan
Venue
Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
Published
2018-08-05
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
725-740
ISSN
  • 1524-8380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8324
OpenAlex
W2885104484
Cited by
275
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10
FWCI
6.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trauma Violence & Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (74672)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
Keywords
trauma-informed practice, employee training, organizational interventions, systemic change, staff knowledge and attitudes, client outcomes, intervention effectiveness, methodological limitations, retention of training effects
MeSH terms
Exposure to Violence, Attitude of Health Personnel, Health Personnel, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review