The Effectiveness of Educational Interventions on Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying Among Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
In consideration of the adverse societal, physical, and psychological impacts of bullying on a child’s development and future, many studies have developed anti-bullying programs and educational interventions to curb bullying occurrences. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to examine the effectiveness of such educational interventions at reducing the frequencies of traditional bullying or cyberbullying and cybervictimization among adolescents. A comprehensive search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Google Scholar, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Only quantitative studies that reported the effects of educational interventions on reducing the frequencies of traditional bullying or cyberbullying victimization and perpetration were included. Seventeen studies ( N total = 35,694 adolescents, Range child age = 10–18 years) were finalized, and meta-analyses were conducted using a random effect model. Overall, the existing educational interventions had very small to small effect sizes on traditional bullying and cyberbullying perpetration (traditional: standardized mean differences [SMD] = −.30 and cyber: SMD = −.16) and victimization (traditional: SMD = −18 and cyber: SMD = −.13) among adolescents. Type of intervention (i.e., whole school–based or classroom-based), program duration, and presence of parental involvement did not moderate program effectiveness, but cyberbullying programs were more effective when delivered by technology-savvy content experts compared to teachers. Since existing educational interventions were marginally effective in reducing bullying frequencies, further research is needed to identify key moderators that enhance educational programs or develop alternative forms of anti-bullying interventions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Participation in cyberbullying intervention programmes has a small but significant effect in reducing victimization.
“Participation in cyberbullying intervention programmes has been consistently shown across 11 meta-analyses to have a small but significant effect in reducing victimization25,26,89–91,102,105,122,125,128.”
From Umbrella review of meta-analyses on the risk factors, protective factors, consequences and interventions of cyberbullying victimization (2024) · cites this paper as [25]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 81 · Cited by 186
- Authors
- Ng, E. D., Chua, J. Y. X., & Shorey, S.
- Affiliations
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- KK Women's and Children's Hospital (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Shorey, Shefaly
- Venue
- Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-06-26
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 132-151
- ISSN
- 1524-8380 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8324
- OpenAlex
- W3037974849
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trauma Violence & Abuse (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Keywords
- bullying prevention, bullying prevention programs, educational intervention, traditional bullying, cyberbullying, cyber victimization, cyberbullying perpetration, adolescents, school-based intervention, parental involvement, intervention moderators
- MeSH terms
- Cyberbullying, Adolescent, Child, Humans, Schools, Program Evaluation, Crime Victims, Bullying
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review