The association between child maltreatment and pathological narcissism: A three-level meta-analytic review
Open accessAbstract
Emerging evidence has documented the positive association between child maltreatment and both phenotypes of pathological narcissism (i.e., vulnerable and grandiose narcissism). However, results across these studies are inconsistent. Therefore, the present meta-analysis aimed to examine the extent to which child maltreatment is associated with vulnerable and grandiose narcissism, and whether these associations differed by study or sample characteristics. A systematic literature review was conducted in Web of Science, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Google Scholar, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Three-level meta-analyses were performed in R to synthesize the effect sizes. A total of 15 studies ( N = 9,141 participants) producing 129 effect sizes were included. Results showed that child maltreatment was positively related to both vulnerable narcissism (mean r = .198; p < .001) and grandiose narcissism (mean r = .087; p < .001), but only to a small extent. Further, the association between child maltreatment and vulnerable narcissism was stronger for neglect ( r = .278) than for physical abuse ( r = .130). The strength of the association between child maltreatment and grandiose narcissism was larger for samples that were on average younger than 18 years ( r = .187) than for samples that were on average older than 18 years ( r = .068). Also, the strength of the association was stronger for females than for males. Child maltreatment is a risk factor for developing both vulnerable and grandiose narcissism. Interventions targeting pathological narcissism should be aware of potential trauma resulting from victimization of child maltreatment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PN is strongly associated with a history of child maltreatment, particularly neglect.
“Strongly associated with a history of child maltreatment, particularly neglect (47–49)”
From Psychoanalytically informed MDMA-assisted therapy for pathological narcissism: a novel theoretical approach (2025) · cites this paper as [47]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 74 · Cited by 54
- Authors
- Gao, S., Yu, D., Assink, M., Chan, K. L., Zhang, L., & Meng, X.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai University (CN)
- Fujian Normal University (CN)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Meng, Xianxin
- Venue
- Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2023-01-18
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 275-290
- ISSN
- 1524-8380 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8324
- OpenAlex
- W4317358917
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 2.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- handle.uba.uva.nl
- Locations
- Trauma Violence & Abuse (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC31600886)
- Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (20YJC840012)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Keywords
- child abuse, pathological narcissism, vulnerable narcissism, grandiose narcissism, child neglect, physical abuse, age differences, sex differences, trauma, risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Child, Child Abuse, China, Female, Humans, Male, Narcissism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review