Cited by 54Child Abuse and TraumaPersonality Traits and PsychologyPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

The association between child maltreatment and pathological narcissism: A three-level meta-analytic review

Open access
Gao, Shuling, Yu, Delin, Assink, Mark, Chan, Ko Ling, Zhang, Ling, Meng, Xianxin·2024·Trauma, Violence, & Abuse

Abstract

Emerging evidence has documented the positive association between child maltreatment and both phenotypes of pathological narcissism (i.e., vulnerable and grandiose narcissism). However, results across these studies are inconsistent. Therefore, the present meta-analysis aimed to examine the extent to which child maltreatment is associated with vulnerable and grandiose narcissism, and whether these associations differed by study or sample characteristics. A systematic literature review was conducted in Web of Science, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Google Scholar, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Three-level meta-analyses were performed in R to synthesize the effect sizes. A total of 15 studies ( N = 9,141 participants) producing 129 effect sizes were included. Results showed that child maltreatment was positively related to both vulnerable narcissism (mean r = .198; p < .001) and grandiose narcissism (mean r = .087; p < .001), but only to a small extent. Further, the association between child maltreatment and vulnerable narcissism was stronger for neglect ( r = .278) than for physical abuse ( r = .130). The strength of the association between child maltreatment and grandiose narcissism was larger for samples that were on average younger than 18 years ( r = .187) than for samples that were on average older than 18 years ( r = .068). Also, the strength of the association was stronger for females than for males. Child maltreatment is a risk factor for developing both vulnerable and grandiose narcissism. Interventions targeting pathological narcissism should be aware of potential trauma resulting from victimization of child maltreatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/15248380221147559

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 74 · Cited by 54

Authors
Gao, S., Yu, D., Assink, M., Chan, K. L., Zhang, L., & Meng, X.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai University (CN)
  • Fujian Normal University (CN)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Corresponding author
Meng, Xianxin
Venue
Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
Published
2023-01-18
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
275-290
ISSN
  • 1524-8380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8324
OpenAlex
W4317358917
Cited by
54
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 3
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trauma Violence & Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC31600886)
  • Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (20YJC840012)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
child abuse, pathological narcissism, vulnerable narcissism, grandiose narcissism, child neglect, physical abuse, age differences, sex differences, trauma, risk factors
MeSH terms
Child, Child Abuse, China, Female, Humans, Male, Narcissism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review