A Scoping Review of Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence in Low- and Middle-Income Countries Across Asia
Abstract
Technology-facilitated gender-based violence (GBV) is a pervasive issue. Yet, most research focuses on high-income countries and few studies comprehensively summarize its prevalence, manifestations, and implications in the Global South. This scoping review sought to examine technology-facilitated GBV in low- and middle-income countries across Asia, specifically focusing on trends, common behaviors, and characteristics of perpetrators and survivors. A comprehensive search of peer-reviewed and gray literature published between 2006 and 2021 yielded 2,042 documents, of which 97 articles were included in the review. Across South and Southeast Asia, findings indicate that technology-facilitated GBV is a widespread phenomenon, with increased incidence during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technology-facilitated GBV comprises various forms of behaviors and prevalence varies by type of violence. Women, girls, and sexual and gender minorities, especially those with other intersecting marginalized identities, are often more vulnerable to experiencing online violence. Alongside these findings, the review revealed gaps in the literature including a lack of evidence from Central Asia and the Pacific Islands. There is also limited data on prevalence which we attribute to underreporting, in part due to disjointed, outdated, or nonexistent legal definitions. Findings from the study can be leveraged by key stakeholders such as researchers, practitioners, governments, and technology companies to develop prevention, response, and mitigation efforts.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Cassidy, W., Faucher, C., & Jackson, M. (2013) · School Psychology International · doi:10.1177/0143034313479697 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Embodied Harms: Gender, Shame, and Technology-Facilitated Sexual Violence
Henry, N., & Powell, A. (2015) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801215576581 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
The prevalence of technology-facilitated sexual violence: A meta-analysis and systematic review
Patel, U., & Roesch, R. (2022) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838020958057 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Image-Based Sexual Abuse: Online Distribution Channels and Illicit Communities of Support
Henry, N., & Flynn, A. (2019) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801219863881 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Online sexual harassment over anonymous social media in Bangladesh
Nova, F. F., Rifat, M. R., Saha, P., Ahmed, S. I., & Guha, S. (2019) · Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development · doi:10.1145/3287098.3287107 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review
Henry, N., & Beard, G. (2024) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380241266137 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Barriers to AI adoption for women in higher education: a systematic review of the Asian context
Kalim, U., Kanwar, A., Sha, J., & Huang, R. (2025) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-025-00390-5 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bansal, V., Rezwan, M., Iyer, M., Leasure, E., Roth, C., Pal, P., & Hinson, L.
- Affiliations
- National Opinion Research Center (US)
- International Center for Research on Women (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bansal, Vaiddehi
- Venue
- Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2023-03-04
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 463-475
- ISSN
- 1524-8380 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8324
- OpenAlex
- W4323067095
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 2.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trauma Violence & Abuse (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- United States Agency for International Development (Contract No.: GS-10F-0033M /7200AA18M00016, Taskin)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Keywords
- technology-facilitated gender-based violence, online violence, low- and middle-income countries, Asia, COVID-19 pandemic, perpetrators, survivors, sexual and gender minorities, intersectionality, underreporting, violence prevention
- MeSH terms
- Gender-Based Violence, Developing Countries, Female, Humans, Sexual Behavior, Violence, Pandemics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review