Prevalence, Disclosure, and Help Seeking in Black and Asian Male Survivors of Sexual Violence in the United Kingdom: A Rapid Review
Open accessAbstract
Sexual violence against men has been significantly overlooked, and under-researched, with minimal attention paid to the influence of culture and ethnicity on survivors’ experiences of abuse. This rapid review examines prevalence, disclosure, help-seeking, and criminal justice experiences of Black and Asian male survivors in the United Kingdom. Eight empirical studies published since 2003 involving Black and Asian sexual violence survivors were included through comprehensive database searches, including gray literature and reference lists. Findings suggest prevalence data underestimate the true extent of victimization in ethnic minority groups in the United Kingdom. Barriers to disclosure and help-seeking were associated with specific cultural factors unique to Black and Asian male experiences, as revealed by three qualitative studies. However, accessing and reporting to the criminal justice system remains largely unexplored for Black and Asian male survivors. Methodological limitations within existing studies emphasize the urgent need for substantial, high-quality research that addresses issues with inconsistent definitions, measurements, and lack of ethnic-specific approaches across prevalence, disclosure, help-seeking, and criminal justice experiences. Culturally informed professional training emerges as a critical requirement to sensitively address the unique challenges faced by ethnic minority male survivors. Additionally, targeted outreach initiatives hold the potential to engage minority male survivors more effectively. A collaborative, system-wide approach is vital to bring to the forefront the overlooked experiences of ethnic minority males, thereby promoting an environment of support, understanding, and recovery.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Men in same-sex relationships, particularly gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men, report higher rates of sexual victimisation.
“The overrepresentation of heterosexual participants in this study contrasts with existing research suggesting that men in same-sex relationships, particularly gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men, report higher rates of sexual victimisation [12].”
From ‘We don’t talk about that around here’: an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) of South Asian male survivors’ experiences of childhood sexual abuse in the UK (2025) · cites this paper as [12]
The Discussion (page unavailable) says research finds increased rates of sexual victimization among sexual-minority men, including men who have sex with men. The review also reports a high rate in a sample of gay and bisexual men. It does not establish higher rates specifically for men in same-sex relationships, a relationship-status distinction the claim adds. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredCultural identities shape the lived experiences of male survivors of sexual violence, influencing their sense-making, recognition, disclosure, and help seeking behaviours.
“Although prevalence estimates vary, research from different cultural settings emphasizes the importance of understanding how cultural identities shape the lived experiences of male survivors of sexual violence, influencing their sense-making, recognition, disclosure, and help seeking behaviours [12].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 85 · Cited by 22
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Abdullah-Khan N. (2008). Male rape: The emergence of a social and legal issue. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
- Authors
- Widanaralalage, B. K., Jennings, S., Dando, C., & Mackenzie, J.-M.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- University of Westminster (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Widanaralalage, B. Kennath
- Venue
- Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2024-04-17
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 3299-3314
- ISSN
- 1524-8380 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8324
- PMC
- PMC11370200
- OpenAlex
- W4394873989
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 3.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Trauma Violence & Abuse (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- WestminsterResearch (University of Westminster) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- British Academy (SRG22\220635)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Keywords
- sexual violence against men, ethnic minority men, prevalence of sexual violence, disclosure of sexual violence, help-seeking barriers, United Kingdom
- MeSH terms
- Help-Seeking Behavior, Adult, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Sex Offenses, Prevalence, Survivors, Crime Victims, Disclosure, Black People, Asian People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review