Cited by 48Physical Activity and HealthUrban Transport and AccessibilitySports and Physical Education Studies

Environmental Influences on Physical Activity in Rural Midwestern Adults: A Qualitative Approach

Open access
Chrisman, Matthew, Nothwehr, Faryle, Yang, Ginger, Oleson, Jacob·2015·Health Promotion Practice

Abstract

Qualitative research can be used to examine multiple factors associated with physical activity and help practitioners identify language used by the rural adult population when discussing this behavior. Three focus groups were conducted among 19 residents of multiple towns in a rural Midwestern county to examine the language and influences on rural physical activity. Focus group members were asked to define physical activity, exercise, community, and neighborhood. They were asked about the activities they engaged in and facilitators and barriers to those activities. A guidebook was developed to capture major themes and common patterns that emerged in the responses to the topics discussed. The data were reviewed for repeated statements and points that were agreed on by multiple participants. Important factors associated with physical activity include the importance of social support and modeling physical activity behavior. Also, the influence of pets and children was important for engaging these adults in physical activity. The focus group members engaged in walking and bicycling in their neighborhood streets and community trails, and desired to see community buildings be open to the public for exercise. This study revealed contextual issues and culturally relevant language for practitioners to use in tailoring physical activity measurement tools or designing interventions for a rural adult population. Social support (specifically, seeing others being active and using pets as motivators for being active) and policy attitudes may be targeted for interventions to increase physical activity in rural adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1524839914524958

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 48

Authors
Chrisman, M., Nothwehr, F., Yang, G., & Oleson, J.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Venue
Health Promotion Practice
Published
2014-03-24
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
142-148
ISSN
  • 1524-8399 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6372
OpenAlex
W1979547063
Cited by
48
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Promotion Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P30CA086862)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Sports and Physical Education Studies
Keywords
physical activity, rural adults, social support, social modeling, walking, cycling, barriers and facilitators, health promotion interventions
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Environment, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Rural Population, Social Environment, Socioeconomic Factors, Exercise, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review