Environmental Influences on Physical Activity in Rural Midwestern Adults: A Qualitative Approach
Open accessAbstract
Qualitative research can be used to examine multiple factors associated with physical activity and help practitioners identify language used by the rural adult population when discussing this behavior. Three focus groups were conducted among 19 residents of multiple towns in a rural Midwestern county to examine the language and influences on rural physical activity. Focus group members were asked to define physical activity, exercise, community, and neighborhood. They were asked about the activities they engaged in and facilitators and barriers to those activities. A guidebook was developed to capture major themes and common patterns that emerged in the responses to the topics discussed. The data were reviewed for repeated statements and points that were agreed on by multiple participants. Important factors associated with physical activity include the importance of social support and modeling physical activity behavior. Also, the influence of pets and children was important for engaging these adults in physical activity. The focus group members engaged in walking and bicycling in their neighborhood streets and community trails, and desired to see community buildings be open to the public for exercise. This study revealed contextual issues and culturally relevant language for practitioners to use in tailoring physical activity measurement tools or designing interventions for a rural adult population. Social support (specifically, seeing others being active and using pets as motivators for being active) and policy attitudes may be targeted for interventions to increase physical activity in rural adults.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Families were more likely to engage in regular physical activity if children or pets participated as well.
“Studies showed regular PA was more likely in a family when the children or pets were also involved in the activity.106,107”
From The Impact of Physical Activity in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes (2025) · cites this paper as [107]
Friends and family social support is a major influence on physical activity.
“Social support from friends and family plays a large role in physical activity.”
From The Impact of Physical Activity in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes (2025) · cites this paper as [107]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 48
- Authors
- Chrisman, M., Nothwehr, F., Yang, G., & Oleson, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- Venue
- Health Promotion Practice
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-03-24
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 142-148
- ISSN
- 1524-8399 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6372
- PMC
- PMC4256125
- OpenAlex
- W1979547063
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Health Promotion Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (P30CA086862)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
- Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Sports and Physical Education Studies
- Keywords
- physical activity, rural adults, social support, social modeling, walking, cycling, barriers and facilitators, health promotion interventions
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Environment, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Rural Population, Social Environment, Socioeconomic Factors, Exercise, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review