Cited by 12Community Health and DevelopmentPublic Health Policies and EducationHealth Policy Implementation Science

Barriers and Facilitators to Community Health Worker Outreach and Engagement in Detroit, Michigan: A Qualitative Study

Lapidos, Adrienne, Kieffer, Edith C., Guzmán, Rebeca, Hess, Kristen, Flanders, Tessana, Heisler, Michele·2022·Health Promotion Practice

Abstract

An effective approach to engaging populations who face health care access barriers is support from community health workers (CHWs). There is little research, however, on specific barriers and facilitators related to two key areas of CHW practice: outreach, defined as the ability to make any initial contact with the priority population, and engagement, defined as the ability to continue to work with the priority population after initial contact is made. The current qualitative study is ancillary to a randomized evaluation of a CHW-led program for Medicaid Health Plan enrollees. Implementation experiences with outreach and engagement led the evaluators to develop the current study in which health plan and nonhealth plan CHWs (n = 12) serving low-income, predominantly Black populations in Detroit participated in qualitative semistructured interviews to elucidate barriers and facilitators to outreach and engagement. All audio recordings were transcribed verbatim. The study team used inductive qualitative data analysis techniques. Barriers to outreach included inaccurate contact information and mistrust. Barriers to engagement included lack of ability to provide needed resources, leading to hopelessness and diminished trust, and discontinuity of services due to eligibility changes and terminated programs. Facilitators included adapting outreach schedules and strategies to community needs, availability of resources, and relational strategies that leveraged CHW social proximity. Further research should systematically investigate the relative success of different CHW-led outreach and engagement strategies for specific populations so as to better design and implement CHW programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/15248399211031818

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 12

Authors
Lapidos, A., Kieffer, E. C., Guzmán, R., Hess, K., Flanders, T., & Heisler, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Detroit Health Department, Detroit, MI, USA
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
Corresponding author
Lapidos, Adrienne
Venue
Health Promotion Practice
Published
2021-09-22
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
1094-1104
ISSN
  • 1524-8399 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6372
OpenAlex
W3199542542
Cited by
12
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Promotion Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Poverty Solutions at the University of Michigan
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK092926)
  • Michigan Department of Health and Human Services
  • blue cross blue shield of michigan foundation
  • Ralph C. Wilson Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
community health workers, outreach, patient engagement, barriers and facilitators, Medicaid enrollees, barriers to care, distrust, social proximity, Detroit
MeSH terms
Community Health Workers, Humans, Michigan, Poverty, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review