Cited by 89Sports Analytics and PerformanceSports Performance and TrainingSport Psychology and Performance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dealing With Randomness in Match Outcomes: How to Rethink Performance Evaluation in European Club Football Using Expected Goals

Brechot, Marc, Flepp, Raphael·2020·Journal of Sports Economics

Abstract

In European club football, decision makers often rely on recent match outcomes when evaluating team performance, even though short-term results are heavily influenced by randomness. This can lead to systematic misjudgments. In this article, we propose a complementary approach for performance evaluation. We build upon the concept of expected goals based on quantified scoring chances and develop a chart that visualizes situations in which a team’s true performance likely deviates from the performance indicated by match outcomes. This should prevent clubs from making flawed decisions when match outcomes are misleading due to the influence of random forces.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1527002519897962

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Anderson C., 2014, The numbers game: Why everything you know about football is wrong
  2. Eggels H., 2016, CEUR Workshop Proceedings
  3. Ensum J., 2004, Journal of Sports Sciences, 22, 504
  4. 10.1162/rest_a_00783 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/smj.1943 · DOI
  6. 10.2307/3003320 · DOI
  7. 10.1287/mnsc.2014.1966 · DOI
  8. Lucey P., 2015, Proceedings of 8th Annual MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference, 1
  9. Pollard R., 2004, International Journal of Soccer and Science, 2, 50
  10. 10.1111/1467-9884.00108 · DOI
  11. 10.14198/jhse.2017.12.Proc2.05 · DOI
  12. Taleb N., 2005, Fooled by randomness: The hidden role of chance in life and in the markets (Vol. 1)
  13. 10.1111/1467-8721.00044 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/24748668.2011.11868563 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Brechot, M., & Flepp, R.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Flepp, Raphael
Venue
Journal of Sports Economics
Published
2020-01-22
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
335-362
ISSN
  • 1527-0025 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7794
OpenAlex
W3002308282
Cited by
89
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4
FWCI
8.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sports Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Sports Analytics and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
Keywords
expected goals, team performance evaluation, decision-making in sport

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review