Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 8

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Mere Fan Effect on Home-Court Advantage

Ganz, Scott C, Allsop, Kieran·2024·Journal of Sports Economics
DOI 10.1177/15270025231200890
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The existence of a home-court advantage is one of the most durable empirical patterns in all of sports. Yet, the mechanisms explaining its strength and persistence remain a mystery in large part because of well-known challenges with statistical identification. We use attendance restrictions in place during the 2020–2021 National Basketball Association regular season as an instrument in order to identify the effect of fans and crowd size on home-court advantage. We show that home teams win by [Formula: see text] points, on average, when fans are present at games compared with [Formula: see text] points when no fans are present. This equates to winning approximately 2.2 additional home games over the course of a regular season. In fixed effects instrumental variables regression models, we estimate that the marginal effect of an additional one thousand fans on home-court advantage is [Formula: see text] points. We conclude that the mere presence of home fans, on its own, explains a larger share of home-court advantage than previously thought.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/15270025231200890

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 10.3390/ijerph19010228 · DOI
  2. 10.1177/1527002520930812 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109664 · DOI
  4. Cross J., Uhrig R. (2022, March). Do Fans Impact Sports Outcomes? A COVID-19 Natural Experiment. Working paper . Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3705085. · DOI
  5. 10.1111/joes.12106 · DOI
  6. 10.1162/0034653053970267 · DOI
  7. 10.1177/15270025211073337 · DOI
  8. Grasso J., Sports Illustrated
  9. 10.1371/journal.pone.0256568 · DOI
  10. Hill Y., Frontiers in Psychology, 12
  11. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00641.x · DOI
  12. Letourneau C., San Francisco Chronicle
  13. 10.1080/1612197X.2003.9671718 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/s41598-020-78901-2 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Moore J. C., Journal of Sport Behavior, 16, 77
  16. 10.2165/00007256-199928040-00001 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Pace A., Canadian Journal of Sport Sciences—Journal Canadien Des Sciences Du Sport, 17, 60
  18. 10.1016/j.joep.2020.102344 · DOI
  19. 10.2202/1559-0410.1192 · DOI
  20. Sors F., European Journal of Sport Science, 21, 1
  21. 10.1123/jsep.32.4.483 · DOI
  22. Wunderlich F., PLOS ONE, 16(3), E0248590

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ganz, S. C., & Allsop, K.
Affiliations
  • Georgetown MSB and AEI, Washington, DC, USA
  • Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
ORCID
Allsop, Kieran
Venue
Journal of Sports Economics
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2023-09-12
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
30-53
ISSN
  • 1527-0025
  • 1552-7794
DOI
10.1177/15270025231200890
Cited by
8
References
0
Language
en
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.