The Friendship Assemblage: Investigating Programmed Sociality on Facebook
Abstract
In an age in which social networking sites have become the preferred way of socializing online, the question of how to think about the contours of friendship in and through these mediated spaces becomes all the more important. In contrast to much existing research on online friendship, this article takes on a software-sensitive approach. Through a close reading of various sociotechnical processes in which friendship is activated on Facebook (i.e., registering, making a profile, finding friends, communicating, etc.), this article suggests that friendships online need to be understood as a gathering of heterogeneous elements that include both humans and nonhumans. Moreover, this article attempts to show how the traditional notion of friendship as something created between equals and free of structural constraints does not apply to the realm of social networking sites, where software increasingly assists users in making certain choices about who will and who will not be their friends.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The view that digital media corporations are simply expropriating preexisting data from a universal information commons leaves unnoticed the spatiotemporal human activities and programmed sociality that constitute the productive basis of the creation of such data.
“This idea that digital media corporations are simply expropriating some preexisting data part of a 'universal information commons' leaves completely unnoticed the spatiotemporal human activities and the programmed sociality that constitutes the productive basis of the creation of such data”
From Value and Productive Labour in the Era of Digital Technologies (2024) · cites this paper as Bucher 2013
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Value and Productive Labour in the Era of Digital Technologies
Sørensen, S. B. (2024) · tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society · doi:10.31269/triplec.v22i2.1475 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bucher, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Bucher, Taina
- ORCID
- Bucher, Taina
- Venue
- Television & New Media
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-08-24
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 479-493
- ISSN
- 1527-4764 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8316
- OpenAlex
- W2155831516
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 14
- FWCI
- 9.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Television & New Media (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
- Keywords
- online friendship, social networking sites, Facebook, assemblage theory, socio-technical processes, non-human actors, human-technology relations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review