The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Curriculum-Based Measurement for Mathematics at the High School Level: What We Do Not Know . . . What We Need to Know
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to explore the research and developmental needs for curriculum-based measurement (CBM) at the secondary level (9th through 12th grades) for mathematics. Much has been accomplished empirically on the validity, reliability, and utility of CBM as an assessment measure in mathematics at the elementary level. Encouragingly, a few CBM mathematics studies are beginning to emerge at the early (preschool through 1st grades) and middle school levels (6th through 8th grades); however, only one study exists on the use of CBM as an assessment tool for secondary-level mathematics courses. First, the author discusses the current mathematics predicament of secondary students with and without disabilities and their teachers. She then, within the different educational settings (general education, inclusion, resource, self-contained) available at the secondary level, discusses the types of CBM research (technical adequacy, instructional utility) needed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As of 2008, most of the research on CBM has been in reading, not mathematics.”
From Curriculum-Based Measurement: A Brief History of Nearly Everything from the 1970s to the Present (2013) · cites this paper as [137]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- 10.1177/074193259701800205 · DOI
- 10.1177/002221949703000105 · DOI
- Calhoon, M.B., 2006, International Dyslexia Association, 31
- 10.1177/07419325070280050401 · DOI
- 10.1177/07419325030240040601 · DOI
- 10.1177/073724770503000202 · DOI
- 10.1080/02796015.2004.12086245 · DOI
- 10.1080/02796015.2001.12086131 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/073724770002500301 · DOI
- Foegen, A., Remedial and Special Education
- 10.1177/002246690103500102 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/002246690103400405 · DOI
- Foegen, A., Journal of Special Education
- 10.1177/1534508407313489 · DOI
- 10.1080/02796015.2004.12086241 · DOI
- 10.1177/001440299105700603 · DOI
- 10.1080/1045988X.1991.10871068 · DOI
- 10.2307/1511375 · DOI
- Fuchs, L.S. & Fuchs, D. (1999). Performance assessment using complex tasks: Implications for children with high incidence disabilities. In R. Gallimore, C. Birheimer, D. MacMillan, D. Speece, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Developmental perspectives on high-incidence disabilities: Papers in honor of Barbara K. Keogh (pp. 199-222). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- 10.1177/001440299205800507 · DOI
- 10.3102/00028312028003617 · DOI
- 10.1177/073724779401900403 · DOI
- Fuchs, L.S., 1990, Monitoring basic skills progress: Basic math [Computer software]
- Greene, H.A., 1953, Measurement and evaluation in the elementary school
- 10.1177/00224669020360020501 · DOI
- 10.1177/073724770202800102 · DOI
- Hosp, M.K., 2007, The ABCs of CBM: A practical guide to curriculum-based measurement
- Manzo, K., 2007, Education Week, 26, 12
- 10.1177/002221949803100613 · DOI
- National Assessment of Educational Progress., 2003, The nation's report card
- National Assessment of Educational Progress., 2005, The nation's report card
- 10.17161/fec.v24i5.7538 · DOI
- 10.1002/pits.20113 · DOI · Paper page
- Taylor, R.D., Paper presented at the annual conference of the Missouri Unit of the Association of Teacher Educators
- 10.1177/001440298505200301 · DOI
- 10.1177/105381510402700103 · DOI
- 10.1080/02796015.2001.12086121 · DOI
- Xin, M., 2007, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 230
- 10.1177/001440298605200603 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Curriculum-Based Measurement: A Brief History of Nearly Everything from the 1970s to the Present
Tindal, G. (2013) · ISRN Education · doi:10.1155/2013/958530 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Calhoon, M. B.
- Affiliations
- Georgia State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Calhoon, Mary Beth
- ORCID
- Calhoon, Mary Beth
- Venue
- Assessment for Effective Intervention
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 234-239
- ISSN
- 1534-5084 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-7458
- OpenAlex
- W2027725024
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Assessment for Effective Intervention (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- curriculum-based measurement, high school mathematics, students with disabilities, general education, inclusive education, resource rooms, self-contained classrooms, technical adequacy, reliability and validity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
