Cited by 18Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyCancer survivorship and careWorkplace Spirituality and Leadership

Religion, Spirituality, and Cancer: The Question of Individual Empowerment

Open access
Vonarx, Nicolas, Hyppolite, Shelley-Rose·2013·Integrative Cancer Therapies

Abstract

It has often been noted that people with a severe illness endeavor to deepen their religious and spiritual practice and knowledge. It is generally accepted that spiritual and religious factors help sick people confront their suffering. The authors conducted a qualitative research on the role of religious and spiritual practices and knowledge among 10 cancer patients in Québec, Canada. Individual interviews focused on their illness experience confirmed that religion and spirituality can be present and contribute to coping when life is threatened. More precisely, the analyses of the place and use of these resources during the patient's illness showed that these resources contributed to an individual empowerment process that was undertaken in response to a biographic and existential disruption induced by the illness diagnosis. The sick people took advantage of religious and spiritual content in their quest for meaning and a cure, progressing from a stage of despair and powerlessness to a stage of hope, a critical analysis of the disease, and a better management and control of it and its evolution. This article describes how people suffering from cancer use and participate in religious and spiritual content. It demonstrates the contribution of this content to an individual empowerment process. The use of religion and spirituality constitutes a quest for self-mastery, an acquiring of power and control. We understand that religious and spiritual phenomena do not always prevent peop…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1534735411433835

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

10 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vonarx, N., & Hyppolite, S.-R.
Affiliations
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • Direction de la Santé Publique de la Capitale-Nationale, Québec, Canada
Venue
Integrative Cancer Therapies
Published
2012-04-13
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
69-80
ISSN
  • 1534-7354 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-695X
OpenAlex
W1983793260
Cited by
18
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Integrative Cancer Therapies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
Keywords
religion, spirituality, cancer patients, coping with illness, illness experience, self-empowerment, meaning-making, hope and despair, self-control, religious and spiritual practices
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Power, Psychological, Quebec, Religion, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review