Cited by 49Cancer survivorship and careCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Can a Multimodal Mind–Body Program Enhance the Treatment Effects of Physical Activity in Breast Cancer Survivors With Chronic Tumor-Associated Fatigue? A Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Spahn, Günther, Choi, Kyung-Eun, Kennemann, Charlotte, Lüdtke, Rainer, Franken, Ulla, Langhorst, Jost, Paul, Anna, Dobos, Gustav J.·2013·Integrative Cancer Therapies

Abstract

Background. Chronic fatigue is one of the most restricting symptoms following primary breast cancer treatment, but clinical studies on symptom management are rare. The objective was to evaluate the impact of a multimodal mind–body program (MMMT), including moderate physical activity as compared with a walking intervention alone, on chronic fatigue symptoms of women with stage I to IIIA breast cancer. Patients and Methods. Sixty-four women (mean age = 56.7 years) suffering from chronic fatigue after active tumor treatment were randomly assigned to either an experimental or a control (n = 32 each) intervention (10 weeks). Fatigue, quality of life (QoL), functional well-being, anxiety, and depression were measured with standard questionnaires at baseline, after 10 weeks, and after 3 months. Results. Compared with baseline, both groups had reduced fatigue scores after treatment without any significant difference between groups (posttreatment, Δ = −0.3, confidence interval = −1.6 to 1.0, P = .678; follow-up, Δ = −0.4, confidence interval = −1.8 to 0.9, P = .510). All patients also improved regarding QoL and general functional well-being. Conclusion. Since both interventions reduced fatigue symptoms and enhanced QoL to a similar extent, we observed no verifiable add-on effect of the MMMT regarding fatigue symptoms. Considering the higher costs with additional expenditure related to MMMT, home-based walking intervention is recommended.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1534735413492727

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 49

Authors
Spahn, G., Choi, K.-E., Kennemann, C., Lüdtke, R., Franken, U., Langhorst, J., Paul, A., & Dobos, G. J.
Affiliations
  • Clinic Öschelbronn CIMK, Center for Integrative Medicine and Cancer treatment, Niefern-Öschelbronn, Germany
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
  • Deutsches Stiftungszentrum (DE)
Venue
Integrative Cancer Therapies
Published
2013-06-13
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
291-300
ISSN
  • 1534-7354 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-695X
OpenAlex
W1975782992
Cited by
49
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Integrative Cancer Therapies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
breast cancer survivors, chronic fatigue, physical activity, walking intervention, quality of life, functional well-being, anxiety, depression, symptom management, home-based exercise
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Chronic Disease, Combined Modality Therapy, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Quality of Life, Treatment Outcome, Survivors, Mind-Body Therapies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review