Can a Multimodal Mind–Body Program Enhance the Treatment Effects of Physical Activity in Breast Cancer Survivors With Chronic Tumor-Associated Fatigue? A Randomized Controlled Trial
Open accessAbstract
Background. Chronic fatigue is one of the most restricting symptoms following primary breast cancer treatment, but clinical studies on symptom management are rare. The objective was to evaluate the impact of a multimodal mind–body program (MMMT), including moderate physical activity as compared with a walking intervention alone, on chronic fatigue symptoms of women with stage I to IIIA breast cancer. Patients and Methods. Sixty-four women (mean age = 56.7 years) suffering from chronic fatigue after active tumor treatment were randomly assigned to either an experimental or a control (n = 32 each) intervention (10 weeks). Fatigue, quality of life (QoL), functional well-being, anxiety, and depression were measured with standard questionnaires at baseline, after 10 weeks, and after 3 months. Results. Compared with baseline, both groups had reduced fatigue scores after treatment without any significant difference between groups (posttreatment, Δ = −0.3, confidence interval = −1.6 to 1.0, P = .678; follow-up, Δ = −0.4, confidence interval = −1.8 to 0.9, P = .510). All patients also improved regarding QoL and general functional well-being. Conclusion. Since both interventions reduced fatigue symptoms and enhanced QoL to a similar extent, we observed no verifiable add-on effect of the MMMT regarding fatigue symptoms. Considering the higher costs with additional expenditure related to MMMT, home-based walking intervention is recommended.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is growing evidence that movement-based interventions for cancer patients (in terms of physical activity and exercise) are safe and feasible and improve quality of life.
“There is growing evidence that movement-based interventions for cancer patients (in terms of physical activity and exercise) are safe and feasible and improve quality of life.”
Effect sizes of movement-based interventions for cancer patients are mostly small.
“Effect sizes, however, are mostly small [85–91].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 49
- Authors
- Spahn, G., Choi, K.-E., Kennemann, C., Lüdtke, R., Franken, U., Langhorst, J., Paul, A., & Dobos, G. J.
- Affiliations
- Clinic Öschelbronn CIMK, Center for Integrative Medicine and Cancer treatment, Niefern-Öschelbronn, Germany
- University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
- Deutsches Stiftungszentrum (DE)
- Venue
- Integrative Cancer Therapies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-06-13
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 291-300
- ISSN
- 1534-7354 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-695X
- OpenAlex
- W1975782992
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 2.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Integrative Cancer Therapies (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
- Keywords
- breast cancer survivors, chronic fatigue, physical activity, walking intervention, quality of life, functional well-being, anxiety, depression, symptom management, home-based exercise
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Chronic Disease, Combined Modality Therapy, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Quality of Life, Treatment Outcome, Survivors, Mind-Body Therapies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review