Meta-analysis of exercise training on vascular endothelial function in cancer survivors
Open accessAbstract
Cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD) are leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Vascular endothelial dysfunction, an important contributor in the development of CVD, improves with exercise training in patients with CVD. However, the role of regular exercise to improve vascular function in cancer survivors remains equivocal. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the effect of exercise training on vascular endothelial function in cancer survivors. We searched PubMed (1975 to 2016), EMBASE CINAHL (1937 to 2016), OVID MEDLINE (1948 to 2016), and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials (1991 to 2016) using search terms: vascular function, endothelial function, flow-mediated dilation [FMD], reactive hyperemia, exercise, and cancer. Studies selected were randomized controlled trials of exercise training on vascular endothelial function in cancer survivors. We calculated pooled effect sizes and performed a meta-analysis. We identified 4 randomized controlled trials (breast cancer, n=2; prostate cancer, n=2) measuring vascular endothelial function by FMD (n=3) or reactive hyperemia index (n=1), including 163 cancer survivors (exercise training, n=82; control, n=81). Aerobic exercise training improved vascular function (n=4 studies; standardized mean difference [95% CI]=0.65 [0.33, 0.96], I 2 =0%; FMD, weighted mean difference [WMD]=1.28 [0.22, 2.34], I 2 =23.2%) and peak exercise oxygen uptake (3 trials; WMD [95% CI]=2.22 [0.83, 3.61] mL/kg/min; I 2 =0%). Our findings indicate that exercise training improves vascular endothelial function and exercise capacity in breast and prostate cancer survivors.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Four recent RCTs not included in either systematic review show consistent evidence of small to moderate effect sizes on overall sleep quality for aerobic training, walking, and resistance training.
“Four recent RCTs not included in either systematic review have shown consistent evidence of small to moderate effect sizes on overall sleep quality for aerobic training(51), in addition to walking specifically(52, 53) and one study reported evidence of benefit for resistance training(31).”
From Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus Statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable (2019) · cites this paper as [53]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 57 · Cited by 48
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [7]Haykowsky M Pituskin E Paterson I Physical health and exercise in cancer [published online 8 31, 2016]. Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 08: 01 Available at: http://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/articles/2016/08/31/08/01/physical-health-and-exercise-in-cancer.
- Authors
- Beaudry, R. I., Liang, Y., Boyton, S. T., Tucker, W. J., Brothers, R. M., Daniel, K. M., Rao, R., & Haykowsky, M. J.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Haykowsky, Mark J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Integrative Cancer Therapies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-02-02
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 192-199
- ISSN
- 1534-7354 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-695X
- PMC
- PMC6041934
- OpenAlex
- W2792186591
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 0.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Integrative Cancer Therapies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Keywords
- exercise training, endothelial function, cancer survivors, flow-mediated dilation, reactive hyperemia index, aerobic exercise, exercise capacity, peak oxygen uptake, breast cancer, prostate cancer, cardiovascular disease
- MeSH terms
- Cancer Survivors, Endothelium, Vascular, Humans, Neoplasms, Exercise, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Endothelial Cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review