Self-contained, low-cost Body-on-a-Chip systems for drug development
Open accessAbstract
Integrated multi-organ microphysiological systems are an evolving tool for preclinical evaluation of the potential toxicity and efficacy of drug candidates. Such systems, also known as Body-on-a-Chip devices, have a great potential to increase the successful conversion of drug candidates entering clinical trials into approved drugs. Systems, to be attractive for commercial adoption, need to be inexpensive, easy to operate, and give reproducible results. Further, the ability to measure functional responses, such as electrical activity, force generation, and barrier integrity of organ surrogates, enhances the ability to monitor response to drugs. The ability to operate a system for significant periods of time (up to 28 d) will provide potential to estimate chronic as well as acute responses of the human body. Here we review progress towards a self-contained low-cost microphysiological system with functional measurements of physiological responses. Impact statement: Multi-organ microphysiological systems are promising devices to improve the drug development process. The development of a pumpless system represents the ability to build multi-organ systems that are of low cost, high reliability, and self-contained. These features, coupled with the ability to measure electrical and mechanical response in addition to chemical or metabolic changes, provides an attractive system for incorporation into the drug development process. This will be the most complete review of the pumpless platform with recirculation yet written.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Microfluidic systems can link different organs-on-a-chip to potentially simulate the complexity of multiorgan drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics.
“Furthermore, microfluidic systems can link different organs-on-a-chip to potentially simulate the complexity of multiorgan drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics9,47,50,68–71.”
From Tumor-on-a-chip: from bioinspired design to biomedical application (2021) · cites this paper as [68]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 91 · Cited by 59
- Authors
- Wang, Y. I., Oleaga, C., Long, C. J., Esch, M. B., McAleer, C. W., Miller, P. G., Hickman, J. J., & Shuler, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- University of Central Florida (US)
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shuler, Michael L
- ORCID
- Venue
- Experimental Biology and Medicine
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2017-02-17
- Volume
- 242
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 1701-1713
- ISSN
- 0071-3384 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3702
- 1535-3699
- PMC
- PMC5786364
- OpenAlex
- W2588617183
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 91
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 3.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Experimental Biology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (R44TR001326, UH2TR000516)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (R44 TR001326-0A1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
- Keywords
- body-on-a-chip, drug development, drug toxicity assessment, electrical activity, barrier integrity
- MeSH terms
- Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Humans, Models, Biological, Cell Culture Techniques, Microchip Analytical Procedures, Lab-On-A-Chip Devices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review