The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
QIC Program and Model Selection in GEE Analyses
Open accessAbstract
The generalized estimating equation (GEE) approach is a widely used statistical method in the analysis of longitudinal data in clinical and epidemiological studies. It is an extension of the generalized linear model (GLM) method to correlated data such that valid standard errors of the parameter estimates can be drawn. Unlike the GLM method, which is based on the maximum likelihood theory for independent observations, the gee method is based on the quasilikelihood theory and no assumption is made about the distribution of response observations. Therefore, Akaike's information criterion, a widely used method for model selection in glm, is not applicable to gee directly. However, Pan (Biometrics 2001; 57: 120–125) proposed a model-selection method for gee and termed it quasilikelihood under the independence model criterion. This criterion can also be used to select the best-working correlation structure. From Pan's methods, I developed a general Stata program, qic, that accommodates all the distribution and link functions and correlation structures available in Stata version 9. In this paper, I introduce this program and demonstrate how to use it to select the best working correlation structure and the best subset of covariates through two examples in longitudinal studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Generalized Estimating Equations
Hardin, J. W., & Hilbe, J. M. (2002) · doi:10.1201/9781420035285 · Cited by 1,766
Cited by
Bezner Kerr, R., Kangmennaang, J., Dakishoni, L., Nyantakyi-Frimpong, H., Lupafya, E., Shumba, L., Msachi, R., Boateng, G. O., Snapp, S. S., Chitaya, A., et al. (2019) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2019.04.004 · Cited by 155
de Melo, M. B., Daldegan‐Bueno, D., Menezes Oliveira, M. G., & de Souza, A. L. (2022) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.15858 · Cited by 116
Fatori, D., Fonseca Zuccolo, P., Shephard, E., Brentani, H., Matijasevich, A., Archanjo Ferraro, A., Aparecida Fracolli, L., Chiesa, A. M., Leckman, J., Constantino Miguel, E., et al. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-93938-7 · Cited by 29
Hendrickson, Z. M., Leddy, A. M., Galai, N., Beckham, S. W., Davis, W., Mbwambo, J. K., Likindikoki, S., & Kerrigan, D. L. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0252728 · Cited by 25
Fatori, D., Argeu, A., Brentani, H., Chiesa, A., Fracolli, L., Matijasevich, A., Miguel, E. C., & Polanczyk, G. (2020) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/13686 · Cited by 21
Adamou Mana, Z., Beaudou, C. N., Hilaire, K. F. J., Konso, J., Ndahbove, C., Waindim, Y., Ganava, M., Malama, T., Matip, C., Meoto, P., et al. (2022) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0000301 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Cui, J.
- Venue
- The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 209-220
- ISSN
- 1536-867X (ISSN-L)
- 1536-8734
- OpenAlex
- W2100706982
- Cited by
- 467
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
