The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metan: Fixed- and Random-Effects Meta-Analysis
Open accessAbstract
This article describes updates of the meta-analysis command metan and options that have been added since the command's original publication (Bradburn, Deeks, and Altman, metan – an alternative meta-analysis command, Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints, vol. 8, pp. 86–100). These include version 9 graphics with flexible display options, the ability to meta-analyze precalculated effect estimates, and the ability to analyze subgroups by using the by() option. Changes to the output, saved variables, and saved results are also described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Two researchers (including C.B.) assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, version 1.0.14 Discrepancies were resolved by consensus with a third reviewer (C.L.H.).”
From Association of Antenatal Diet and Physical Activity–Based Interventions With Gestational Weight Gain and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [14]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Self-citationWinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility
Lunn, D. J., Thomas, A., Best, N., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (2000) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1023/a:1008929526011 · Cited by 5,397
Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume I - The analysis of case-control studies.
Breslow, N. E., & Day, N. E. (1980) · PubMed · Cited by 4,895
Kirkwood, B. R., & Sterne, J. A. C. (2014) · Bristol Research (University of Bristol) · Cited by 2,820
Self-citationPublication and related bias in meta-analysis
Sterne, J. A. C., Gavaghan, D., & Egger, M. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00242-0 · Cited by 2,282
Self-citationDeeks, J. J., Altman, D. G., & Bradburn, M. J. (2001) · Systematic Reviews in Health Care · doi:10.1002/9780470693926.ch15 · Cited by 2,163
Self-citationEfficacy of BCG Vaccine in the Prevention of Tuberculosis
Colditz, G. A. (1994) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03510330076038 · Cited by 2,021
What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta‐analysis of sparse data
J. Sweeting, M., J. Sutton, A., & C. Lambert, P. (2004) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1761 · Cited by 1,734
Statistical methods in cancer research. Vol. 1. The analysis of case-control studies
(1983) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/0278-6915(83)90281-8 · Cited by 1,727
Variation in protection by BCG: implications of and for heterologous immunity
Fine, P. (1995) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92348-9 · Cited by 1,385
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Bradburn M. J., 1998, Stata Technical Bulletin, 44, 4
- Sharp S., 1997, Stata Technical Bulletin, 38, 9
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n160 · Cited by 13,262
Walker, E. R., McGee, R. E., & Druss, B. G. (2015) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.2502 · Cited by 2,976
Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data
Nyaga, V. N., Arbyn, M., & Aerts, M. (2014) · Archives of Public Health · doi:10.1186/2049-3258-72-39 · Cited by 2,139
Methods to estimate the between‐study variance and its uncertainty in meta‐analysis
Veroniki, A. A., Jackson, D., Viechtbauer, W., Bender, R., Bowden, J., Knapp, G., Kuss, O., Higgins, J. P., Langan, D., & Salanti, G. (2016) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1164 · Cited by 1,685
Global prevalence of anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-regression
Baxter, A. J., Scott, K. M., Vos, T., & Whiteford, H. A. (2013) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s003329171200147x · Cited by 1,537
Metadata
- Authors
- Harris, R. J., Deeks, J. J., Altman, D. G., Bradburn, M. J., Harbord, R. M., & Sterne, J. A. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Harris, Ross J.
- Venue
- The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-28
- ISSN
- 1536-867X (ISSN-L)
- 1536-8734
- OpenAlex
- W1595237219
- Cited by
- 1,027
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 80 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 32
- FWCI
- 21.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Stata Journal Promoting communications on statistics and Stata (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
- AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Data Analysis with R
- Keywords
- Stata, fixed-effects meta-analysis, random-effects meta-analysis, subgroup analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
