The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparing the Predictive Powers of Survival Models Using Harrell's C or Somers’ D
Open accessAbstract
Medical researchers frequently make statements that one model predicts survival better than another, and they are frequently challenged to provide rigorous statistical justification for those statements. Stata provides the estat concordance command to calculate the rank parameters Harrell's C and Somers’ D as measures of the ordinal predictive power of a model. However, no confidence limits or p-values are provided to compare the predictive power of distinct models. The somersd package, downloadable from Statistical Software Components, can provide such confidence intervals, but they should not be taken seriously if they are calculated in the dataset in which the model was fit. Methods are demonstrated for fitting alternative models to a training set of data, and then measuring and comparing their predictive powers by using out-of-sample prediction and somersd in a test set to produce statistically sensible confidence intervals and p-values for the differences between the predictive powers of different models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parameters behind “Nonparametric” Statistics: Kendall's tau, Somers’ D and Median Differences
Newson, R. (2002) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x0200200103 · Cited by 394
Self-citation
Cited by
Can machine-learning improve cardiovascular risk prediction using routine clinical data?
Weng, S. F., Reps, J., Kai, J., Garibaldi, J. M., & Qureshi, N. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0174944 · Cited by 1,346
Celis-Morales, C. A., Welsh, P., Lyall, D. M., Steell, L., Petermann, F., Anderson, J., Iliodromiti, S., Sillars, A., Graham, N., Mackay, D. F., et al. (2018) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.k1651 · Cited by 772
Baber, U., Mehran, R., Sartori, S., Schoos, M. M., Sillesen, H., Muntendam, P., Garcia, M. J., Gregson, J., Pocock, S., Falk, E., et al. (2015) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.01.017 · Cited by 461
Extreme lipoprotein(a) levels and improved cardiovascular risk prediction
Kamstrup, P. R., Tybjærg-Hansen, A., & Nordestgaard, B. G. (2013) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.023 · Cited by 284
Sillesen, H., Sartori, S., Sandholt, B., Baber, U., Mehran, R., & Fuster, V. (2018) · European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging · doi:10.1093/ehjci/jex239 · Cited by 204
Metadata
- Authors
- Newson, R. B.
- Venue
- The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 339-358
- ISSN
- 1536-867X (ISSN-L)
- 1536-8734
- OpenAlex
- W2143415050
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing the Predictive Powers of Survival Models Using Harrell's C or Somers’ D. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1536867x1001000303
- The paper
- Newson, R. B. (2010). Comparing the Predictive Powers of Survival Models Using Harrell's C or Somers’ D. The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x1001000303
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.