The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Computing Adjusted Risk Ratios and Risk Differences in Stata
Open accessAbstract
In this article, we explain how to calculate adjusted risk ratios and risk differences when reporting results from logit, probit, and related nonlinear models. Building on Stata's margins command, we create a new postestimation command, adjrr, that calculates adjusted risk ratios and adjusted risk differences after running a logit or probit model with a binary, a multinomial, or an ordered outcome. adjrr reports the point estimates, delta-method standard errors, and 95% confidence intervals and can compute these for specific values of the variable of interest. It automatically adjusts for complex survey design as in the fit model. Data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey are used to illustrate multiple applications of the command.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Agarwal, A., Mukherjee, A., Kumar, G., Chatterjee, P., Bhatnagar, T., & Malhotra, P. (2020) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.m3939 · Cited by 718
Trial of Endovascular Treatment of Acute Basilar-Artery Occlusion
Tao, C., Nogueira, R. G., Zhu, Y., Sun, J., Han, H., Yuan, G., Wen, C., Zhou, P., Chen, W., Zeng, G., et al. (2022) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2206317 · Cited by 699
Adams, R., Henry, K. E., Sridharan, A., Soleimani, H., Zhan, A., Rawat, N., Johnson, L., Hager, D. N., Cosgrove, S. E., Markowski, A., et al. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01894-0 · Cited by 365
A deep learning system for predicting time to progression of diabetic retinopathy
Dai, L., Sheng, B., Chen, T., Wu, Q., Liu, R., Cai, C., Wu, L., Yang, D., Hamzah, H., Liu, Y., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02702-z · Cited by 339
Boehmer, T. K., Kompaniyets, L., Lavery, A. M., Hsu, J., Ko, J. Y., Yusuf, H., Romano, S. D., Gundlapalli, A. V., Oster, M. E., & Harris, A. M. (2021) · MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report · doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7035e5 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Norton, E. C., Miller, M. M., & Kleinman, L. C.
- Venue
- The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 492-509
- ISSN
- 1536-867X (ISSN-L)
- 1536-8734
- OpenAlex
- W21944932
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computing Adjusted Risk Ratios and Risk Differences in Stata. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1536867x1301300304
- The paper
- Norton, E. C., Miller, M. M., & Kleinman, L. C. (2013). Computing Adjusted Risk Ratios and Risk Differences in Stata. The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x1301300304
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
