Cited by 23

Development and Implementation of Targeted STEM Retention Strategies at a Hispanic-Serving Institution

Carpi, Anthony, Ronan, Darcy M., Falconer, Heather M., Boyd, Heather H., Lents, Nathan H.·2013·Journal of Hispanic Higher Education

Abstract

Retention rates of undergraduates at large urban universities serving minority populations have been problematic, especially among students in science and technology fields. John Jay College of Criminal Justice has designed a cohesive collegiate retention program according to the Tinto model of retention. This article details the strategies utilized as they relate to known factors affecting college persistence. Preliminary outcomes of this work are also explored in terms of student involvement and institutional support.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1538192713486279

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carpi, A., Ronan, D. M., Falconer, H. M., Boyd, H. H., & Lents, N. H.
Affiliations
  • John Jay College, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA
  • University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA
Venue
Journal of Hispanic Higher Education
Published
2013-05-08
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
280-299
ISSN
  • 1538-1927
  • 1552-5716
Cited by
23
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review