Science, Reason, and Facilitated Communication
Abstract
Keywords autism, communications, court cases, ethics, facilitated communication, mental retardation, prompts, public policy, research, validation (empirical)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
No communication came from the client through facilitated communication in this study.
“First, consistent with prior research (e.g., Green, 1994), no communication All clients appeared to enjoy the sessions, as came from the client through facilitated comevidenced by greeting the research assistants munication.”
From AN EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF FACILITATED COMMUNICATION (1995) · cites this paper as Green, 1994
Prior experimental studies demonstrated facilitator control of the typing in facilitated communication.
“Following the publication of these criticisms, a number of researchers published experimental studies that demonstrated facilitator control of the typing in facilitated communi-”
From AN EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF FACILITATED COMMUNICATION (1995) · cites this paper as Green, 1994
The finding that facilitators controlled the typing is consistent with prior research (Green, 1994).
“This is also consistent with prior research (Green, 1994).”
From AN EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF FACILITATED COMMUNICATION (1995) · cites this paper as Green, 1994
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 74 · Cited by 53
- Authors
- Green, G., & Shane, H. C.
- Affiliations
- Northeastern University (US)
- Boston Children's Hospital (US)
- Venue
- Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1994-09
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 151-172
- ISSN
- 0274-9483 (ISSN-L)
- 0749-1425
- OpenAlex
- W1980965341
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 20.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Keywords
- facilitated communication, autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, court cases, ethics, prompting, public policy, validation, science and reason
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
