The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Indirect Vision Driving with Fixed Flat Panel Displays for Near Unity, Wide, and Extended Fields of Camera View
Abstract
A field study with eight participants negotiating a road course in a military vehicle measured the driving performance for natural and indirect vision. The indirect vision system was driven with fixed panoramic flat panel, liquid crystal displays (LCD) in the cab and a forward viewing monocular camera array mounted on the front roof of the vehicle and tilted slightly downward. The results are that for benign driving conditions (a well-marked course, good visibility, and essentially flat terrain), the participants successfully drove the vehicle with indirect vision for the different fields of view (FOV) of the cameras: near unity, wide, and extended. However, they drove the course faster and made fewer lane marker strikes with natural vision than they did with the indirect vision systems. Further, the course speed significantly decreased with increased camera FOV, while the number of lane marker strikes increased slightly. Workload ratings show a significant increase in perceived workload with indirect vision, while a test of situational awareness shows an increase in demand component. While the heart rate increased significantly with course speed because of the increased exertion, the predicted metabolic work output was least for the natural vision and increased with the indirect FOV because of the longer course times. Most participants reported a discomfort associated with motion sickness while in the moving vehicle with the displays, The subjective stress rating of the drivers was least for natural vision and increased with indirect FOV. In comparing the camera's FOV, the driving performance was fastest with the near unity FOV. However, cognitive processing tests show a trend for improved spatial rotation and map planning with the wide FOV, a design which was selected by the researchers to provide a balance of the resolution needed for obstacle avoidance and scene perspective for course following.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research
(1988) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62386-9 · Cited by 15,003
Motion Sickness and Oculomotor Systems in Virtual Environments
Ebenholtz, S. M. (1992) · Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments · doi:10.1162/pres.1992.1.3.302 · Cited by 103
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- 10.1162/pres.1992.1.3.295 · DOI
- Kroemer K.H.E., 1997, Engineering Physiology
- Neter J., 1996, Applied Linear Statistical Models
- Taylor R.M., Selcon S.J. [1994]. “Situation in mind: Theory, applications, and measurement of situational awareness.” In Gilson RD, Garland D. J., Koonce J. M. (Eds.), Situational Awareness in Complex Systems.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Study of Multimodal Interfaces and the Improvements on Teleoperation
Triantafyllidis, E., Mcgreavy, C., Gu, J., & Li, Z. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2990080 · Cited by 105
“Providing a larger field of view can also result in increased performance and environmental awareness [22], [24], [25], but can decrease usability and increase perceived difficulty and workload demand [25].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Smyth, C. C.
- Affiliations
- DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Smyth, Christopher C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 36
- Pages
- 541-544
- ISSN
- 0163-5182 (ISSN-L)
- 1071-1813
- 2169-5067
- OpenAlex
- W2072118402
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
- Keywords
- panoramic display, LCD display, camera field of view, driving performance, driver workload, situational awareness, heart rate, motion sickness, driver stress, spatial rotation, obstacle avoidance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
