Cited by 69Technology Use by Older AdultsPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionPatient Dignity and Privacy

Benefits and Privacy Concerns of a Home Equipped with a Visual Sensing System: A Perspective from Older Adults

Caine, Kelly E., Fisk, Arthur D., Rogers, Wendy A.·2006·Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting

Abstract

Monitoring technology has the potential to allow older adults to remain in their homes longer than may otherwise be possible. However, often this monitoring technology captures images which may cause privacy concerns, especially when these images are captured in a home environment. We used Likert scales within a structured interview to investigate privacy concerns in an aware or smart home environment. Specifically, we were interested in how the type of image that was captured and the level of functioning of the person being monitored affected privacy concerns in a home environment. The data suggest that both device type as well as level of functioning affect privacy concerns in a variety of situations, providing the first evidence that certain privacy concerns are not independent of situation variables.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/154193120605000203

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Older adults' privacy concerns about monitoring systems are conditional, being weighed against potential benefits such as maintaining independence, monitoring only by family, or necessity.

    “With respect to privacy concerns, the older adults' comments were conditional: If this [ monitoring system ] would keep me independent longer, I wouldn't mind as much ; If it's only my daughter who monitors me, it's alright; If you really need it, privacy becomes secondary.”

    From Toward a Psychological Science of Advanced Technology Design for Older Adults (2010) · cites this paper as Caine, Fisk, & Rogers, 2006

  • Older adults were more willing to have cameras if their cognitive function had declined, their movement abilities had declined, or they were facing a decision to move to an assisted living facility.

    “They were more willing to have cameras if they were in a situation where their cognitive function had declined, their movement abilities had declined, or if they were facing a decision to move to an assisted living facility.”

    From Toward a Psychological Science of Advanced Technology Design for Older Adults (2010) · cites this paper as Caine, et al., 2006

  • Older adults reported they would be open to having visual sensing devices, including cameras, in their home.

    “Older adults also reported that they would be open to the idea of having visual sensing devices in their home, including cameras ( Caine, et al., 2006 ).”

    From Toward a Psychological Science of Advanced Technology Design for Older Adults (2010) · cites this paper as Caine, et al., 2006

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caine, K. E., Fisk, A. D., & Rogers, W. A.
Affiliations
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2006-10
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
180-184
ISSN
  • 0163-5182 (ISSN-L)
  • 1071-1813
  • 2169-5067
OpenAlex
W2170447496
Cited by
69
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Patient Dignity and Privacy
Keywords
privacy concerns, older adults, home automation, image acquisition, situational factors, device type, functional capacity, aging in place

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review