The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Relation between perceived effort and the electromyographic signal in localized low-effort activities
Abstract
Hand-based human–machine interfaces are complex tasks that involve repetitive or sustained movements and postures of the hands that can lead to overuse syndromes of the musculoskeletal system. Consequently, it is important to minimize the physical effort that occurs at these interfaces. The evaluation of physical effort can be performed either by subjective evaluation of the relative perceived effort (e.g., Borg scale) or by objective physiological measurements (e.g., electromyography – EMG). However, the relation between these two measures has not been sufficiently studied for localized low-effort activities. This study investigated the relation between EMG and Borg ratings, as well as the issue of gender differences during low-effort activity of forearm muscles. Nine females and nine males performed eight different hand gestures (localized low-effort activity), during which EMG signals were recorded from six forearm muscles and Borg ratings were obtained. On average, the female subjects rated the gestures as less effortful than the male subjects, and also demonstrated a higher positive correlation between the EMG and Borg ratings. Furthermore, the linear model that was fitted for predicting the Borg ratings based on gender and the combined activity of muscles provided an R-squared value of approximately 0.3.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Humans can perceive their localized effort, which can be reflected in electromyographic recordings.
“and their localized effort, which can be reflected in electromyographic recordings (Korol et al., 2014(Korol et al., , 2017)).”
From Preferred walking speed on rough terrain: is it all about energetics? (2019) · cites this paper as Korol et al., 2014
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Agarabi M., 2004, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 4, 2450
- 10.1249/00005768-198205000-00012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0003-6870(00)00008-9 · DOI
- Chin D. H., 2002, J Calif Dent Assoc, 30, 149
- 10.1123/jab.13.2.135 · DOI
- De Luca C. J., 1985, CRC critical reviews inbiomedical engineering, 11, 253
- 10.1620/tjem.215.287 · DOI
- 10.1055/s-2007-1024707 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00846029 · DOI
- Lagally K. M., 2004, J Strength Cond Res, 18, 359
- 10.1152/japplphysiol.01111.2005 · DOI
- 10.1097/00005768-200205000-00021 · DOI
- 10.1080/00140139408964911 · DOI
- 10.1152/japplphysiol.01183.2001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/001401399185865 · DOI
- 10.1080/001401397187793 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00181-1 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICSC.2008.29 · DOI
- 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d32e29 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.04.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0095-4543(05)70278-5 · DOI
- 10.5014/ajot.48.5.411 · DOI
- 10.1080/00140130701308716 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Preferred walking speed on rough terrain: is it all about energetics?
Gast, K., Kram, R., & Riemer, R. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.185447 · Cited by 58
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Korol, G., Karniel, A., Melzer, I., Ronen, A., Edan, Y., Stern, H., & Riemer, R.
- Affiliations
- Department of Biomedical Engineering
- Department of Physical Therapy
- Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1077-1081
- ISSN
- 1071-1813
- 2169-5067
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review