The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Individual Differences in Human-Agent Teaming: An Analysis of Workload and Situation Awareness through Eye Movements
Abstract
Studies investigating the effects of level of autonomy (LOA) on workload and performance in human-agent teams typically utilize subjective measures, but do not often incorporate physiological measures. This paper examines how well eye movement data collected in a recent experiment converges with the findings suggested by the subjective measures. Several eye behavior measures (fixation count, average fixation duration, blink rate, saccade amplitude and pupil diameter) were evaluated, and findings based on these compared to findings of NASA-TLX and situation awareness questionnaires. In addition, individual differences due to perceived attentional control were evaluated. Findings indicate that the physiological measures account for variance in workload that typical subjective measures may not, as they are more sensitive to individual differences among participants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The MIX testbed was used in 15 articles (Wright et al., 2014).”
From Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature (2022) · cites this paper as Wright et al., 2014
In the citing paper
“Specifically, the CERTT-UAS-STE (Cooke & Shope, 2004) and the MIX (Wright et al., 2014) were used in 24% and 20% of the studies, respectively”
From Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature (2022) · cites this paper as Wright et al., 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research
(1988) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62386-9 · Cited by 15,003
Kang, M. J., Hsu, M., Krajbich, I. M., Loewenstein, G., McClure, S. M., Wang, J. T.-Y., & Camerer, C. F. (2009) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02402.x · Cited by 882 · cited 1×
“Increased pupil diameter has been found to occur in tasks requiring high mental workload (Van Orden et al., 2000; Van Orden, Limbert, Makeig, & Jung, 2001; Iqbal, Zheng, & Bailey, 2004) as well as situations of increased interest (Kang et al., 2009).”
Task-evoked pupillary response to mental workload in human-computer interaction
Iqbal, S. T., Zheng, X. S., & Bailey, B. P. (2004) · CHI '04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/985921.986094 · Cited by 317
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Barber D., 2008, Proceedings of the 26th Army Science Conference
- 10.1109/THMS.2013.2293535 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0018720811435843 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00140139.2012.689013 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSMCC.2010.2056682 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/08995600802565785 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-843X.111.2.225 · DOI · Paper page
- Drexler J.M., 2012, Effects of display dimension and viewpoint synchronization on robot teleoperation performance in a simulated environment
- 10.14236/ewic/HCI2007.12 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0169-8141(98)00068-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/1-4020-3389-3_15 · DOI
- Hoffman J. E., 1998, Attention, 119
- Jacob R. J., 2003, Mind, 2, 4
- Kasarskis P., 2001, Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology
- 10.1016/0001-6918(90)90067-P · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1974.tb01114.x · DOI
- 10.1037/1076-898X.9.2.119 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/CTS.2010.5478467 · doi:10.1109/cts.2010.5478467
- 10.1177/001872089403600209 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0301-0511(99)00043-5 · DOI
- 10.1518/001872001775992570 · DOI · Paper page
- Wright J.L., 2013, The effects of level of autonomy on human-agent teaming for multi-robot control and local security maintenance
- 10.1037/0096-1523.23.1.244 · DOI
Cited by
Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature
O’Neill, T., McNeese, N., Barron, A., & Schelble, B. (2022) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720820960865 · Cited by 695
Metadata
- Authors
- Wright, J. L., Quinn, S. A., Chen, J. Y. C., & Barnes, M. J.
- Affiliations
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory—Human Research and Engineering Directorate, Orlando, FL
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory—Human Research and Engineering Directorate, Fort Huachuca, AZ
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1410-1414
- ISSN
- 1071-1813
- 2169-5067
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Individual Differences in Human-Agent Teaming: An Analysis of Workload and Situation Awareness through Eye Movements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1541931214581294
- The paper
- Wright, J. L., Quinn, S. A., Chen, J. Y. C., & Barnes, M. J. (2014). Individual Differences in Human-Agent Teaming: An Analysis of Workload and Situation Awareness through Eye Movements. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931214581294
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
