The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pilot Performance and Workload Using Traffic Displays to Support Free Flight
Abstract
Arising from the need to employ innovative solutions to safely and efficiently maintain air traffic separation in increasingly denser skyways, the concept of Free Flight involves shifting some air traffic management responsibilities from air traffic control specialists on the ground, to pilots in the cockpit. Such a shift in traffic management responsibilities will be critically dependent upon the development of displays to provide traffic and hazard information to pilots in the cockpit (Wickens, Carbonari, Merwin, Morphew, & O'Brien (1997; Battiste (in progress); Johnson, Battiste, Delzell, Holland, Belcher, & Jordan, 1997). This research examined the effect of different information-varying display aids (predictors and threat vectors) for in-cockpit traffic displays, on pilot performance, workload, attentional demands, and flight safety. Fifteen pilots flew a series of traffic avoidance scenarios in a Free Flight simulation designed to assess the effects of different levels of traffic display information on these pilot variables. Three, 2D-coplanar prototype displays were compared which differed in the level of traffic information provided. Analysis of the data revealed that the traffic display with the most predictive information supported increased safety and decreased workload, without appreciable decrements in flight performance or efficiency.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cockpit predictor displays decrease pilot workload and improve hazard detection performance.
“Cockpit predictor displays have also shown that pilot workload decreases and hazard detection performance improves with the addition of predictive information concerning the flight path of neighboring aircraft [21].”
From A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation (2000) · cites this paper as [21]
While there is extensive research pointing to the benefits of information automation vs. no automation, there is as yet little empirical work explicitly comparing the effects on human performance of different levels of automation for information acquisition and analysis.
“while there is extensive research pointing to the benefits of information automation vs. no automation (e.g., as in predictor displays for CDTI, see [20], [21]), there is as yet little empirical work explicitly comparing the effects on human performance of different levels of automation for information acquisition and analysis.”
From A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation (2000) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cites
Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research
(1988) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62386-9 · Cited by 15,003
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Battiste V., Bortolussi M. (1988). Assessment of pilot workload with the introduction of an airborne threat-alert system. Presented at SAE Aerotech 1988 in Anaheim, CA, October 1998. · DOI
- Johnson W. W., Battiste V., Delzell Susanne, Holland S., Belcher S., Jordan K. (1997). AIAA Proceedings.
- Merwin D. H., 1996, Evaluation of perspective and coplanar cockpit displays of traffic information to support hazard awareness in freeflight.
- O'Brian J, Wickens C. D. (1997). Free Flight cockpit displays of traffic and weather: Effects of dimensionality and data base integration. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting, pp. 18–22. · DOI
- Wickens C. D., 1997, Cockpit displays to support hazard awareness in Free Flight.
- Wickens C. D., 1998, The Future of Air Traffic Control.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation
Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B., & Wickens, C. D. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans · doi:10.1109/3468.844354 · Cited by 4,195
Self-citationUnreliable Automated Attention Cueing for Air-Ground Targeting and Traffic Maneuvering
Wickens, C. D., Conejo, R., & Gempler, K. (1999) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193129904300105 · Cited by 29
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Morphew, M. E., & Wickens, C. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 52-56
- ISSN
- 0163-5182 (ISSN-L)
- 1071-1813
- 2169-5067
- OpenAlex
- W2088756080
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Air Traffic Management and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Maritime Navigation and Safety
- Keywords
- free flight, pilot workload, pilot performance, air traffic management, traffic avoidance, attack vectors, predictive information, attentional demands, flight safety, aircraft separation, cockpit displays
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review