Cited by 31Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesTraumatic Brain Injury Research

A First Step Toward the Operationalization of the Learned Non-Use Phenomenon: A Delphi Study

Open access
Hirsch, Theresa, Barthel, Maria, Aarts, Pauline, Chen, Yi-An, Freivogel, Susanna, Johnson, Michelle J., Jones, Theresa A., Jongsma, Marijtje L. A. +5 more·2021·Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: The negative discrepancy between residual functional capacity and reduced use of the contralesional hand, frequently observed after a brain lesion, has been termed Learned Non-Use (LNU) and is thought to depend on the interaction of neuronal mechanisms during recovery and learning-dependent mechanisms. Objective: Albeit the LNU phenomenon is generally accepted to exist, currently, no transdisciplinary definition exists. Furthermore, although therapeutic approaches are implemented in clinical practice targeting LNU, no standardized diagnostic routine is described in the available literature. Our objective was to reach consensus regarding a definition as well as synthesize knowledge about the current diagnostic procedures. Methods: We used a structured group communication following the Delphi method among clinical and scientific experts in the field, knowledge from both, the work with patient populations and with animal models. Results: Consensus was reached regarding a transdisciplinary definition of the LNU phenomenon. Furthermore, the mode and strategy of the diagnostic process, as well as the sources of information and outcome parameters relevant for the clinical decision making, were described with a wide range showing the current lack of a consistent universal diagnostic approach. Conclusions: The need for the development of a structured diagnostic procedure and its implementation into clinical practice is emphasized. Moreover, it exists a striking gap between the prevailing hypotheses regarding the mechanisms underlying the LNU phenomenon and the actual evidence. Therefore, basic research is needed to bridge between bedside and bench and eventually improve clinical decision making and further development of interventional strategies beyond the field of stroke rehabilitation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1545968321999064

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Hirsch, T., Barthel, M., Aarts, P., Chen, Y.-A., Freivogel, S., Johnson, M. J., Jones, T. A., Jongsma, M. L. A., Maier, M., Punt, D., Sterr, A., Wolf, S. L., & Heise, K.-F.
Affiliations
  • University of Applied Sciences and Arts Hildesheim/Holzminden/Göttingen (DE)
  • Sint Maartenskliniek (NL)
  • Georgia State University (US)
  • Universität für Weiterbildung Krems (AT)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (ES)
  • University of Birmingham, School of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences, Birmingham, UK
  • University of Surrey (GB)
  • Emory University (US)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Heise, Kirstin-Friederike
Venue
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
Published
2021-03-11
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
383-392
ISSN
  • 0888-4390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-9683
  • 1552-6844
OpenAlex
W3135471956
Cited by
31
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (publishedVersion)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (1509816N)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
learned nonuse, stroke rehabilitation, motor recovery, diagnostic procedures, expert consensus, animal models of stroke, clinical decision-making, intervention strategies
MeSH terms
Neurological Rehabilitation, Delphi Technique, Diagnostic Techniques, Neurological, Humans, Movement Disorders, Perceptual Disorders, Stroke, Upper Extremity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review