An integrative review of paternal depression
Abstract
The aim of this project was to review current research regarding postnatal depression in fathers and to present potential screening and referral options. The search was limited to scholarly (peer reviewed) journals and all articles were retrieved with date limits. Initial search parameters were the following: antenatal depression OR pregnancy depression OR postnatal depression OR perinatal depression AND father* OR men OR paternal. The search yielded 311 abstracts returned. With reference to the inclusion criteria and primary and secondary outcomes intended for the focus of this review, N=63 articles were retrieved and read in full by the researchers. These articles were included in the final integrative review. Depression in fathers following the birth of their child was associated with a personal history of depression and with the existence of depression in their partner during pregnancy and soon after delivery. Based on the review the authors suggest routine screening and assessment of both parents should occur across the pregnancy and postnatal period. The use of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for screening of depression in men needs to be linked to referral guidelines for those individuals who require further investigation and care.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Men's symptoms of depression and anxiety and adjustment disorders, present before or after the birth of the child, are important problems.
“Research has shown that men's symptoms of depression and anxiety and adjustment disorders, present before or after the birth of the child, are also important problems”
From Health From a Gender Perspective (2017) · cites this paper as Edward, Castle, Mills, Davis, & Casey, 2015
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 75 · Cited by 122
- Authors
- Edward, K.-L., Castle, D., Mills, C., Davis, L., & Casey, J.
- Affiliations
- St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Australian Catholic University (AU)
- Venue
- American Journal of Men's Health
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-03-12
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-34
- ISSN
- 1557-9883 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9891
- OpenAlex
- W2064956386
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 10.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Men s Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (acceptedVersion)
- Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
- Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Keywords
- paternal depression, postpartum depression, perinatal depression, antenatal depression, fathers, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, depression screening, referral guidelines, history of depression
- MeSH terms
- Depression, Fathers, Female, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Postpartum Period
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review