The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methodological Rigor in Mixed Methods: An Application in Management Studies
Abstract
As mixed methods continues to grow as a discipline, work to define what constitutes quality mixed methods research has become an emergent conversation. While progress has been made in this area, there has been some debate as to what quality entails and how to achieve it. This article contributes to mixed methods by highlighting the importance of rigor as an interdisciplinary baseline for quality evaluation and proposes a rigorous mixed methods framework. This framework is then applied to the management studies literature to give insight into a literature base where mixed methods research is still relatively nascent. Findings give examples of current practices in management studies as well as an example of how the rigorous mixed methods framework can be operationalized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research
Robinson, P. (2007) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00096.x · Cited by 23,258
Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques
Long, D. R., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1993) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/328955 · Cited by 17,576
Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research
นิลพันธุ์, ม. (2010) · Silpakorn Educational Research Journal · Cited by 9,351
Toward a definition of mixed methods research
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/1558689806298224 · Cited by 6,464
SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010) · doi:10.4135/9781506335193 · Cited by 6,215
Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/01623737011003255 · Cited by 5,687
Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done
Bryman, A. (2006) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794106058877 · Cited by 3,354
The Quality of Mixed Methods Studies in Health Services Research
O'cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2008) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007074 · Cited by 1,916
Kolbe, R. H., & Burnett, M. S. (1991) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209256 · Cited by 1,520
The Call of the Wild: Zookeepers, Callings, and the Double-edged Sword of Deeply Meaningful Work
Bunderson, J. S., & Thompson, J. A. (2009) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.2009.54.1.32 · Cited by 1,202
Cited by
Joint displays for mixed methods research in psychology
McCrudden, M. T., Marchand, G., & Schutz, P. A. (2021) · Methods in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.metip.2021.100067 · Cited by 150
Herro, A., Lee, K. Y., Withall, A., Peisah, C., Chappell, L., & Sinclair, C. (2021) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnaa146 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Harrison, R. L., Reilly, T. M., & Creswell, J. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Mixed Methods Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-02-02
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 473-495
- ISSN
- 1558-6898 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-6901
- OpenAlex
- W3003429708
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 21.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methodological Rigor in Mixed Methods: An Application in Management Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1558689819900585
- The paper
- Harrison, R. L., Reilly, T. M., & Creswell, J. W. (2020). Methodological Rigor in Mixed Methods: An Application in Management Studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819900585
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
