Mental Health Benefits of Strength Training in Adults
Abstract
This review summarizes evidence from randomized controlled trials to examine whether strength training influences anxiety, chronic pain, cognition, depression, fatigue symptoms, self-esteem, and sleep. The weight of the available evidence supported the conclusion that strength training is associated with reductions in anxiety symptoms among healthy adults (5 trials); reductions in pain intensity among patients with low back pain (5 trials), osteoarthritis (8 trials), and fibromyalgia (4 trials); improvements in cognition among older adults (7 trials); improvements in sleep quality among depressed older adults (2 trials); reductions in symptoms of depression among patients with diagnosed depression (4 trials) and fibromyalgia (2 trials); reductions in fatigue symptoms (10 trials); and improvements in self-esteem (6 trials). The evidence indicates that larger trials with a greater range of patient samples are needed to better estimate the magnitude and the consistency of the relationship between strength training and these mental health outcomes. Plausible social, psychological, and neural mechanisms by which strength training could influence these outcomes rarely have been explored. This review revealed the high-priority research need for animal and human research aimed at better understanding the brain mechanisms underlying mental health changes with strength training.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a distinct lack of randomised controlled trials comparing the additive or interactive impacts of aerobic and resistance activity on anxiety symptoms within the same study.
“For example, there is a distinct lack of RCTs comparing the additive or interactive impacts of aerobic and resistance activity on anxiety symptoms within the same study [70].”
From Moving to Beat Anxiety: Epidemiology and Therapeutic Issues with Physical Activity for Anxiety (2018) · cites this paper as [70]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 211 · Cited by 153
- Authors
- O'Connor, P. J., Herring, M. P., & Caravalho, A.
- Affiliations
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Georgia, Athens,
- University of Georgia (US)
- ORCID
- Herring, Matthew P.
- Venue
- American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-05-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 377-396
- ISSN
- 1559-8276 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-8284
- OpenAlex
- W1997881940
- Cited by
- 153
- References
- 211
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Keywords
- resistance training, mental health, anxiety, depression, chronic pain, low back pain, osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, cognition, sleep quality, fatigue, self-esteem, older adults, neural mechanisms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review