Cited by 153Physical Activity and HealthCancer survivorship and careSports Performance and Training

Mental Health Benefits of Strength Training in Adults

O'Connor, Patrick J., Herring, Matthew P., Caravalho, Amanda·2010·American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine

Abstract

This review summarizes evidence from randomized controlled trials to examine whether strength training influences anxiety, chronic pain, cognition, depression, fatigue symptoms, self-esteem, and sleep. The weight of the available evidence supported the conclusion that strength training is associated with reductions in anxiety symptoms among healthy adults (5 trials); reductions in pain intensity among patients with low back pain (5 trials), osteoarthritis (8 trials), and fibromyalgia (4 trials); improvements in cognition among older adults (7 trials); improvements in sleep quality among depressed older adults (2 trials); reductions in symptoms of depression among patients with diagnosed depression (4 trials) and fibromyalgia (2 trials); reductions in fatigue symptoms (10 trials); and improvements in self-esteem (6 trials). The evidence indicates that larger trials with a greater range of patient samples are needed to better estimate the magnitude and the consistency of the relationship between strength training and these mental health outcomes. Plausible social, psychological, and neural mechanisms by which strength training could influence these outcomes rarely have been explored. This review revealed the high-priority research need for animal and human research aimed at better understanding the brain mechanisms underlying mental health changes with strength training.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1559827610368771

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a distinct lack of randomised controlled trials comparing the additive or interactive impacts of aerobic and resistance activity on anxiety symptoms within the same study.

    “For example, there is a distinct lack of RCTs comparing the additive or interactive impacts of aerobic and resistance activity on anxiety symptoms within the same study [70]⁠.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 211 · Cited by 153

Authors
O'Connor, P. J., Herring, M. P., & Caravalho, A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Kinesiology, University of Georgia, Athens,
  • University of Georgia (US)
Venue
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine
Published
2010-05-07
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
377-396
ISSN
  • 1559-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-8284
OpenAlex
W1997881940
Cited by
153
References
211
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
resistance training, mental health, anxiety, depression, chronic pain, low back pain, osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, cognition, sleep quality, fatigue, self-esteem, older adults, neural mechanisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review