The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advocating for Behavior Change With Education
Open accessAbstract
Education is ubiquitous with clinical care. However, not all education supports behavioral change. Education is a broad term that encompasses the process of obtaining general knowledge, personal awareness, and skills training. Although not sufficient, education is a necessary component for behavior change. This article outlines the role of education in behavior change and offers practical suggestions for how clinicians can provide education to their patients to help them change behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
(2001) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/108107301752384442 · Cited by 131
Cited by
Finkelstein, A., Budd, M. A., Gray, B. E., Mirsky, J., Tirosh, A., & Polak, R. (2025) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu17040704 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Arlinghaus, K. R., & Johnston, C. A.
- Venue
- American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-12-09
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 113-116
- ISSN
- 1559-8276 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-8284
- OpenAlex
- W2771467280
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advocating for Behavior Change With Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1559827617745479
- The paper
- Arlinghaus, K. R., & Johnston, C. A. (2018). Advocating for Behavior Change With Education. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827617745479
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
