The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment of Gross Motor Development in the who Multicentre Growth Reference Study
Open accessAbstract
The objective of the Motor Development Study was to describe the acquisition of selected gross motor milestones among affluent children growing up in different cultural settings. This study was conducted in Ghana, India, Norway, Oman, and the United States as part of the longitudinal component of the World Health Organization (WHO) Multicentre Growth Reference Study (MGRS). Infants were followed from the age of four months until they could walk independently. Six milestones that are fundamental to acquiring self-sufficient erect locomotion and are simple to evaluate were assessed: sitting without support, hands-and-knees crawling, standing with assistance, walking with assistance, standing alone, and walking alone. The information was collected by both the children's caregivers and trained MGRS fieldworkers. The caregivers assessed and recorded the dates when the milestones were achieved for the first time according to established criteria. Using standardized procedures, the fieldworkers independently assessed the motor performance of the children and checked parental recording at home visits. To ensure standardized data collection, the sites conducted regular standardization sessions. Data collection and data quality control took place simultaneously. Data verification and cleaning were performed until all queries had been satisfactorily resolved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Motor development: A new synthesis.
Thelen, E. (1995) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.50.2.79 · Cited by 983
Cited by
The who Multicentre Growth Reference Study: Planning, Study Design, and Methodology
de Onis, M., Garza, C., Victora, C. G., Onyango, A. W., Frongillo, E. A., & Martines, J. (2004) · Food and Nutrition Bulletin · doi:10.1177/15648265040251s104 · Cited by 961
Self-citationDay, J. W., Finkel, R. S., Chiriboga, C. A., Connolly, A. M., Crawford, T. O., Darras, B. T., Iannaccone, S. T., Kuntz, N. L., Peña, L. D. M., Shieh, P. B., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(21)00001-6 · Cited by 494
WHO MULTICENTRE GROWTH REFERENCE STUDY GROUP, & de Onis, M. (2006) · Acta Paediatrica · doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.tb02376.x · Cited by 395
Self-citationAdu-Afarwuah, S., Lartey, A., Brown, K. H., Zlotkin, S., Briend, A., & Dewey, K. G. (2007) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/86.2.412 · Cited by 329
Self-citationHealth outcomes in spinal muscular atrophy type 1 following AVXS-101 gene replacement therapy
Al‐Zaidy, S., Pickard, A. S., Kotha, K., Alfano, L. N., Lowes, L., Paul, G., Church, K., Lehman, K., Sproule, D. M., Dabbous, O., et al. (2019) · Pediatric Pulmonology · doi:10.1002/ppul.24203 · Cited by 216
Metadata
- Authors
- Wijnhoven, T. M. A., de Onis, M., Onyango, A. W., Wang, T., Bjoerneboe, G.-E. A., Bhandari, N., Lartey, A., & Rashidi, B. A.
- Venue
- Food and Nutrition Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1_suppl_1
- Pages
- S37-S45
- ISSN
- 0379-5721 (ISSN-L)
- 1564-8265
- OpenAlex
- W188962219
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of Gross Motor Development in the who Multicentre Growth Reference Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/15648265040251s106
- The paper
- Wijnhoven, T. M. A., de Onis, M., Onyango, A. W., Wang, T., Bjoerneboe, G.-E. A., Bhandari, N., Lartey, A., & Rashidi, B. A. (2004). Assessment of Gross Motor Development in the who Multicentre Growth Reference Study. Food and Nutrition Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/15648265040251s106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.