Qualitative Interviewing Using Interpersonal Process Recall: Investigating Internal Experiences during Professional-Client Conversations
Open accessAbstract
Interpersonal process recall (IPR) interviewing uses video-assisted recall to access conscious yet unspoken experiences in professional caregiving interactions. Although IPR has been employed across the helping professions, little has been written about effectively conducting IPR interviews. Drawing on their IPR-based counseling research on hope, the authors provide a framework for the use of IPR interview strategies and for addressing challenges unique to IPR. Specific issues include (a) preparing the research team and setting, (b) issues specific to IPR interviewing, including framing IPR questions, (c) working with heightened emotion, and (d) negotiating professional/researcher roles. Finally, they discuss participant experiences and potential applications of IPR.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
IPR has previously been used in psychotherapy, education, health and sport research to gain rich and detailed information about psychological experiences, processes and behaviours.
“While new to the field of autism, IPR has previously been used in psychotherapy, education, health and sport research to gain rich and detailed information about psychological experiences, processes and behaviours (e.g. Bartz, 1999; Burgess et al., 2013; Larsen et al., 2008; Marsh, 1983; Rhea et al., 1997).”
From Camouflaging in an everyday social context: An interpersonal recall study (2021) · cites this paper as Larsen et al., 2008
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 80 · Cited by 133
- Authors
- Larsen, D., Flesaker, K., & Stege, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Hope Foundation (US)
- Venue
- International Journal of Qualitative Methods
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 18-37
- ISSN
- 1609-4069 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105407940
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 5.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Qualitative Methods (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- ERA: Education and Research Archive (University of Alberta) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative research in health
- Keywords
- interpersonal process recall, inner experience, hope, interview techniques, researcher role, helping professions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
