The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Qualitative and Mixed Methods Social Media Research: A Review of the Literature
Open accessAbstract
Social media technologies have attracted substantial attention among many types of users including researchers who have published studies for several years. This article presents an overview of trends in qualitative and mixed methods social media research literature published from 2007 through 2013. A collection of 229 qualitative studies were identified through a systematic literature review process. A subset of 55 of these articles report studies involving a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods. Articles were reviewed, analyzed, and coded through a qualitative content analysis approach. Overall trends are presented with respect to the entire collection of articles followed by an analysis of mixed methods research approaches identified in the subset of 55 studies. The most commonly used research approaches involved collecting data from people through interview, focus group, and survey methodologies. Content analysis was the second most commonly used approach whereby researchers use Facebook posts, Tweets (Twitter posts), YouTube videos, or other social media content as a data source. Many of the studies involving combinations of quantitative and qualitative data followed a design resembling Creswell and Plano Clark’s basic mixed methods typology (e.g., convergent parallel, explanatory sequential, and exploratory sequential).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology.
Shelley, M., & Krippendorff, K. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288384 · Cited by 24,312
Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research
Robinson, P. (2007) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00096.x · Cited by 23,258
Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003 · Cited by 17,875
Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology
Krippendorff, K. (2019) · doi:10.4135/9781071878781 · Cited by 15,448
Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x033007014 · Cited by 11,170 · cited 2×
“Strategies for describing, defining, or classifying mixed methods research studies have been proposed through the development of various typologies, models, or frameworks (Creswell, 2014; Creswell & Plano Clark, 2011; Guest, 2012; Johnson & Onwuegbuzie, 2004; Nastasi, Hitchcock, & Brown, 2010).”
BackgroundMethodDesigning and Conducting Mixed Methods Research
นิลพันธุ์, ม. (2010) · Silpakorn Educational Research Journal · Cited by 9,351
Toward a definition of mixed methods research
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/1558689806298224 · Cited by 6,464
SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010) · doi:10.4135/9781506335193 · Cited by 6,215
Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice
Schreier, M. (2012) · doi:10.4135/9781529682571 · Cited by 5,801 · cited 1×
“Content analysis, regardless of whether it is qualitative or quantitative, has been described as requiring development of a codebook, which is used to guide coding of content (Krippendorf, 2013; Schreier, 2012).”
MethodA Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research
Creswell, J. W. (2021) · Cited by 4,465
Cited by
Pulido, C. M., Villarejo-Carballido, B., Redondo-Sama, G., & Gómez, A. (2020) · International Sociology · doi:10.1177/0268580920914755 · Cited by 448
After the ‘APIcalypse’: social media platforms and their fight against critical scholarly research
Bruns, A. (2019) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2019.1637447 · Cited by 403
Nomad savage’ and herder–farmer conflicts in Nigeria: the (Un) making of an ancient myth
Eke, S. (2020) · Third World Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01436597.2019.1702459 · Cited by 71
Robinson, A., Davis, M., Hall, J., Lauckner, C., & Anderson, A. K. (2019) · Journal of Human Lactation · doi:10.1177/0890334419831652 · Cited by 57
Park, J., & Jung, Y. (2024) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2024.102200 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Snelson, C. L.
- Venue
- International Journal of Qualitative Methods
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-03-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1609-4069 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2315698405
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 48.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Qualitative and Mixed Methods Social Media Research: A Review of the Literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1609406915624574
- The paper
- Snelson, C. L. (2016). Qualitative and Mixed Methods Social Media Research: A Review of the Literature. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915624574
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.